|  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |  Low-Mid tier Dungeon non-classic custom ZEM's here on p99 Clan Runnyeye  Permafrost Cazic I'm not a huge game "rules", classic/non-classic, EQ neckbeard guy but what the fuck is up with the ZEM's in these zones? They are not even remotely close to original launch ZEM. Its ridiculous. If you can take the time to adjust CB, you can take the time to adjust these back to what they were originally. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 ZEMs are one of the few exceptions to the normal "keep it classic" rule here: the devs would rather have "classic mystery about the ZEMs" than actual classic ZEMs. As I understand it (and really the devs don't like to talk about this stuff ... or anything else on the forums these days, for that matter), it's because the actual classic ZEMs are widely known in EQEmu, and people knowing those exact values is more unclassic to them. Personally I think it's the wrong call, not because it's wrong per say, but because it's an unnecessary exception to a server that's full of classic features people have unclassic knowledge of. I think it fits the vision of a classic EQ server to have classic mechanics of all sort, including ZEM ... but they clearly feel otherwise, and of course we're just lucky to have any of this at all [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] 
				__________________ Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details. | |||
| 
				
					
						Last edited by loramin; 12-19-2019 at 12:32 PM..
					
					
				
			 |  | |||
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 @cd288 I dont have to post proof because all the original zone experience modifiers are in EQEmu. The dungeons I listed are set just above the outdoor zones at 75%. Its stupid. | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   There is so much awesome classic content you cant get groups for because people lust after ZEM exp so only high zem dungeons and zones get groups. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 
				__________________ Shenethax - Iksar Shaman Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer Numdiar - High Elf Mage Zekdos - Troll SK | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   Correct there is a bug report thread with evidence already. There are several major bugs that seem to be getting ignored that are making things very not classic. Feign death changes. ZEMs. Mana per int/wis beyond 200. Item recharging not working for all items. Probably a few others but these have existed for months or even years now on the bug reports forum with evidence provided. If these things were changed to be classic the entire dynamic of P99 would change overnight. Classes like Enchanter are clearly overpowered regardless of being classic yet they aren't nerfed but classes like Necro, Druid, Bard, and others have all been nerfed from their classic state due to being "OP." I was really hopeful that these new servers wouldn't turn into Cheese 2.0 but that is exactly what has happened. People rushing through levels with non-classic ZEM using charmed backstabbing pets so they can poopsock raid mobs with their non-classic levels of inflated mana and easy FD pulling to split mobs. I really don't know why things are being kept so "ez mode" here when adequate proof has been provided. I've just decided that this isn't an attempt at classic EQ anymore. It's just P99 which is fun enough in the right situations. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 | |||
|  | ||||
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |