![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() Any and all forms of the /who lfg command seem to be broken. As of now, a /who lfg returns the results of the corresponding /who (i.e. it ignores the 'lfg' filter). For instance, a "/who all shaman 45 55 lfg" will simply list all of the non-anonymous shamans between levels 45 and 55 currently logged in, regardless of whether they're displaying their LFG tags.
| ||
#2
|
|||
|
![]() Bump! Could you please take a look at this? Making it tough to put groups together.
| ||
#3
|
|||
|
![]() I get that this is a 'low priority' but it sure makes finding groups hard and really hurts the game for a lot of us. I've heard others post suggested 'workarounds' but they don't seem to work for me.
| ||
#4
|
|||
|
![]() Havent found a group since I was level 16 because of this. I am now level 47.
| ||
#5
|
|||
|
![]() It's prolly not "classic"
Ele must have "fixed" it.
__________________
Greattaste, Halfling Druid
| ||
#6
|
|||
|
![]() Any word on this? It worked briefly after the latest patch, stopped working, started working again for a brief period of time...and now is dead.
Would make it sooooo much easier to find players | ||
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Given that this game is built around grouping, I hope this critical function can be fixed soon.
| ||
#9
|
|||
|
![]() The server went down last night, and it's working again. Is it fixed, or as a previous post suggested, it just works for awhile after a server reset?
Silisk | ||
#10
|
|||
|
![]() and its broken again............
| ||
![]() |
|
|