Tallon Zek is starting to sound better

[porigromus]

Mainly just the two teams part. The three teams is going to be a bad idea with evil side being overpowered.

[Smedy]

how would the teams be divided?

[porigromus]

Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how would the teams be divided?

neutral and good versus evil, let's do it! Also opposite teams can not interact with the other team. No chats, heals, buffs, etc. Make it to where once you choose a side that IP address can't choose the other side! (I know that is probably impossible)

No level restrictions on PvP to prevent issues with out of combat healing. Huge XP bonus for groups, reward the groupers! No XP on death and 1 item can be looted from inventory or bags. I am ready for a fresh new start! Can't wait.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by porigromus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

neutral and good versus evil, let's do it! Also opposite teams can not interact with the other team. No chats, heals, buffs, etc. Make it to where once you choose a side that IP address can't choose the other side! (I know that is probably impossible)

No level restrictions on PvP to prevent issues with out of combat healing. Huge XP bonus for groups, reward the groupers! No XP on death and 1 item can be looted from inventory or bags. I am ready for a fresh new start! Can't wait.

The idea of 3 teams is for the 2 weaker teams to gang up on the stronger team. In your example it would be the same as a 2 team server. The good part is that the neutral/good teams can still have fun pvp when not teaming up. The other idea that was introduced was the evil side being FFA, meaning they can even attack themselves. This would be the only thing that would actually even out the evil team in my opinion, the 2 v 1 won't cut it.

I really don't like the idea of no chats but hardcoded teams with no heals/buffs for sure. Restricting chat won't gain any traction on an everquest server. That is something most people hate about games like WoW.

If you are worried about scouts telling people where others are on their team it would happen through teamspeak/vent anyways.

[Sektor]

sounds stupid

[porigromus]

Originally Posted by Sektor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sounds stupid

Thanks for the input everyone. I wanted to personal thank this fella, very constructive feedback!

[porigromus]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The idea of 3 teams is for the 2 weaker teams to gang up on the stronger team. In your example it would be the same as a 2 team server. The good part is that the neutral/good teams can still have fun pvp when not teaming up. The other idea that was introduced was the evil side being FFA, meaning they can even attack themselves. This would be the only thing that would actually even out the evil team in my opinion, the 2 v 1 won't cut it.

I really don't like the idea of no chats but hardcoded teams with no heals/buffs for sure. Restricting chat won't gain any traction on an everquest server. That is something most people hate about games like WoW.

If you are worried about scouts telling people where others are on their team it would happen through teamspeak/vent anyways.

3 teams with evil being FFA would probably work, I see your points. I am looking forward to what ever they do, especially if they fix the pvp issues that are presently on the current server first and foremost.

[Swish]

Start of a really inspiring thread that will shape the new server <3

[Thakisis_VZ]

Get the crew back my body is ready for the next server.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[STILLnotMORNIN]

2 teams server..

Ogres, freeport humans, dark elves vs. the rest..

Yes i left trolls on good team because Ogre warriors too OP.. if you want trolls to be evil.. should give dwarf warriors same stats as ogre then..

On small server anything different will just overload evil team and be dumb and dead within a month.