Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:34 PM
NirrtiXXX NirrtiXXX is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 103
Default Shaman or Enchanter?

I am stuck between classes, I want something that I can do on a low budget as both are said to be. I am not sure which would be best for me as a new player to 1999.

I want something that can solo groups of mobs effectively and not rely on DOTs. I do not think either of these do this.

I also know that enchanters charm then do their thing.

How do the shaman solo, do they kite?

I guess which is better, considering charm is not the most reliable spell.
  #2  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:35 PM
Sulfurian Sulfurian is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 78
Default

Correct me if im wrong , but shaman use dot's alot to solo.
__________________
Sulfurian Mage | Skrazor Monk | Vezzkar Enchanter
  #3  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:36 PM
NirrtiXXX NirrtiXXX is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 103
Default

oh well shows what I know... I meant in comparison to some classes. I have not played ina long time. I guess I was thinking about how a necro dots then relys ona pet while a shaman can either kite or melee until the other is dead. Shaman do have DD too though.
  #4  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:37 PM
Vlak Vlak is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sulfurian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Correct me if im wrong , but shaman use dot's alot to solo.
You are correct sir! Root rotting with DoT's or unsnared kiting... with DoT's.
  #5  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:42 PM
NirrtiXXX NirrtiXXX is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 103
Default

well met me ask this are either of both classes good at taking small camps of blues or commonly taking on oranges/reds solo?

I am mostly looking for a class that fits the bill best that is a low budget class :P.
  #6  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:44 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,836
Default

Dotted mobs don't take a full damage tick (think they lose 33% of each tick) if they aren't either rooted or feared.

"Root rotting" is the way to go on a shaman and can be done on a low budget.

Most enchanters aspire to 200 charisma to charm effectively, I'd say if you can get 150-160 to begin with you're in a good place to solo with charming but will require some plat investment for charisma gear (some of it's cheap however). It's important to break the charm when both mobs get low on HP, and nuke them to death. If you need someone to explain the mechanics of that I'm sure someone can better than me [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:46 PM
NirrtiXXX NirrtiXXX is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 103
Default

so, if i went enchanter should I invest mot of my points into charisma?
  #8  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:51 PM
distung distung is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 55
Default

1. "Better" cannot really defined. Better at what? Killing groups of mobs? In what manner?
2. If you want to solo ("groups of mobs effectively") as a Shaman, you're gonna have to learn to love dots. If you want enchanter, you may want to embrace charming.
3. Sounds like your play style might be more in line with druids/wizards (quads, charm and dot optional).
  #9  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:51 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NirrtiXXX [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
so, if i went enchanter should I invest mot of my points into charisma?
Depends on your race choice I'd say.

Quote:
The subject of where to distribute bonus points is heavily debated among Project 1999 enchanters. The two recommended distributions are either 25 Intelligence, 5 Charisma or 5 Intelligence, 25 Charisma. Those who intend to charm frequently as a solo tactic are advised to distribute their points into Charisma. Enchanters who do not intend to charm will probably see a greater benefit from an increased mana pool.
(from the wiki)

If you're going to solo, I'd go 25 cha / 5 int... unless you're playing a high elf.

Tecmos is the person to ask on this, he's got it nailed.
  #10  
Old 02-14-2014, 03:55 PM
rollin5k rollin5k is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 802
Default

Shamans solo really great if you have epic and jbb otherwise boring as heck do to insane downtime.
Enchanter solo is more excitingfrom what i gather
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.