Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2011, 07:06 AM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default Speak Truth to Power

Must grab opportunity before it's too late to speak.

Not gonna sugarcoat. Not gonna apologize for the truth.

Let me first state, that relatively speaking, the staff on all emu pvp servers I've played are phenomenal.

From a point of perfection, they are horribly flawed.

I can't program. I had to have help to intall and play VZTZ. I made the mistake of thinking anyone who could program EQ and would launch a pvp server, would obviously know more about pvp dynamics than me.

Boy was I wrong.

It really scares me that the people in charge don't already know that rules are an extremely bad idea. Your "fix" causes so many other problems, you would be wiser to leave it be.

The fact that you are even asking about it, means you don't already know better. PvP rules were implemented on VZTZ against my advice. I had already experienced free trade pvp on SZ and already knew what works and what doesn't. They didn't listen. But they eventually learned. PvP rules were rescinded.


It's one thing to have to fail after being told already, then have to listen to them say "i told you so". It's altogether a different story to hear "i told you so" and still do it again. That denotes a lack of intelligence, memory, or learning capacity.


Everyone should be really scared right now for the long term viability of red99.

You will kill the pop before you even start if you are not careful. I could really go in depth here, but not trying to put everyone asleep, just a few of you.

Rules will set the average GM attrition rate to astronomical levels. If you make 1 rule -- just ONE rule... and you will need to make a separate forum section just for GM favoritism threads. Nilbog will have to hire a secretary just to keep up with moderation. Every ruling will require a judge. Every judge will become the newest forum punching bag and target of discontent. You think you are worried about new players reading negative comments now? Hope you have alot of staff applications on hand. You will run through them in 6 months....if server lasts that long. It might help if you go ahead and advertise in USA TODAY for babysitters. They would probably be more qualified for this job than the GMs.

Trim the fat. Put your resources into hack prevention. If you were able to control just that one area, you will have progammed a better eq pvp server than has ever been made... including live.

If you want to make 1 rule about training, I would welcome that from a population point of view. But if you make that one rule about trains, I will not be surprised if you wish you hadn't in 6 months.

Listen to me now, or believe me later.

You have been warned.




Again.



P.S. To staff, needing help mitigating the trolling: The above post was carefully worded to elicit an emotional response for a desired outcome. If you are angry at the above post, and it motivates you to do the wise thing, then despite your anger, you are qualified to be in your position and should be proud.

Conversely, if you are angry and it paralizes or prevents you from doing the wise thing, (searyx effect) then you are not qualified for your position and would do yourself and everyone else a favor by resigning now, and come try to kill me on new server instead. That is, if i am allowed to play seeing as how i just spoke truth to power.

TLDR: Free Trade PvP is the only way.
  #2  
Old 08-22-2011, 09:18 AM
Doors Doors is offline
Planar Protector

Doors's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,933
Default

I mean I got a headache reading that. But I kind of agree. LnS is a good example of a rule that they really shouldn't even bother trying to enforce. Just going to be one massive headache 2 weeks in.
  #3  
Old 08-22-2011, 10:40 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Lol macken thinks anyone gives a fuck about his opinion
  #4  
Old 08-22-2011, 10:44 AM
Deadmantis Deadmantis is offline
Sarnak

Deadmantis's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Training will be against the rules.

Yes I know this won't stop people from doing it.. but that's why pvp servers are filled with douchebags~
__________________
Mindwarp - Gnome Enchanter
Dunkler - Halfling Druid
  #5  
Old 08-22-2011, 10:59 AM
Misto Misto is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 347
Default

iCare
  #6  
Old 08-22-2011, 11:21 AM
OngorDrakan OngorDrakan is offline
Sarnak

OngorDrakan's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol macken thinks anyone gives a fuck about his opinion
!!!! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Drunke

OUT OF THE WAY PECK!

Quote:
12:53 <Littlegyno> nilberg
12:53 <Littlegyno> i was
12:53 <Littlegyno> gonna have pix
  #7  
Old 08-22-2011, 11:58 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Rules wouldn't be needed if reputation mattered on eqemu pvp servers. Unfortunately you have carte blanche to be as much of a douchebag as possible and your reputation will be the same as someone who's never even pvp'd before.

Who are you going to listen to? The person running the highest population eqemu server, or the person who's never been part of a server with a population higher than 100? Who has more authority to say what's best for red99's longevity?
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #8  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:35 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

The best bet for R99's longevity is no GM interaction beyond game mechanics.

Slander, racial slurs, training, LnS, BC'ing... none of that warrants a GM on a PvP server.

Some guy calls you a word you dont like, get friends and go CC / BC him for a few hours. Or fucking use ignore~
  #9  
Old 08-22-2011, 12:48 PM
Bardalicious Bardalicious is offline
Planar Protector

Bardalicious's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol macken thinks anyone gives a fuck about his opinion
  #10  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:45 PM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Who are you going to listen to? The guy who has won practically every pvp server he has ever played on, or someone else? If macken doesn't have the authority to say what's best for red99's longevity, who does?
Listen to me now, or believe me later.

Your choice.

Your consequences.

Yoda says, don't let your hate cloud your judgement.

Don't led the dark side shroud the truth of light in a cloak of darkness.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.