![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
save p99
many will be martyred on the forums to show that p99 is not classic or everquest | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
TAKP is way more accurate to the era it's emulating than P99 is.
The hyper-competitive nerd NASCAR lawyerquest simulator that is the P99 raid scene is an extremely far fetch from what raiding was actually like back in the day. Big guilds with patterns of bad faith behavior are still around and still completely unpunished after years of forcing the entire server to put up with their BS. *mic drop*
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle> Nilwen 55 Ogre Druid <Castle> Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle> Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle> __________________ Green: ACTIVE Blue: INACTIVE Red: INACTIVE Quarm is love Quarm is life | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
i played on takp for about a year and got a 3 box to 65 with decent gear and some AAs
now a days its more of a museum takp is more accurate to eq than p99 "classic everquest" | ||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle> Nilwen 55 Ogre Druid <Castle> Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle> Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle> __________________ Green: ACTIVE Blue: INACTIVE Red: INACTIVE Quarm is love Quarm is life | |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree with the first part - but pretending like there's a guild who is socking raid mobs that acts 100% by the book is not accurate. Source: Furoar was leading raids in Castle last year and hes a scumbag | |||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Emergent player behavior requires emergent dev action. This alone does not make something "unclassic". The very act of devs responding to unpredictable player behavior *is* classic.
For example, when EQ first launched /consent allowed you to fully loot other people's corpses. The devs quickly realized this was ripe for abuse and nerfed it to the existing summon mechanic. And when they did, I was the first one there screaming "this is unclassssicccc!!!!" | ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
99% of people in Castle had no idea of Furoar's background on blue and he's been guildless for a month now FWIW.
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle> Nilwen 55 Ogre Druid <Castle> Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle> Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle> __________________ Green: ACTIVE Blue: INACTIVE Red: INACTIVE Quarm is love Quarm is life | |||
|
#8
|
|||
|
you keep coming back here because its really real
you wouldnt be playing if epics were handed out you wouldnt be playing if you could multibox everything you wouldnt be playing if you had an easy time you stray, but you keep coming home | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle> Nilwen 55 Ogre Druid <Castle> Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle> Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle> __________________ Green: ACTIVE Blue: INACTIVE Red: INACTIVE Quarm is love Quarm is life | |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
IDK if these will get me banned
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] A year - to a year and a half into EQ, some of the highest level Enchanters at the time made no mention of Charm. Enchanters were generally considered mez/buff bots. Enchanter was also a fairly rare class for those of you who don't remember. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] https://www.oocities.org/xymarra/Str...rStrategy.html A website from 2001. They mostly viewed Charm as a form of CC, potentially high DPS, but not worth the risk in most situations. Definitely not something you would use in most groups. Contrary to what people on P99 claim. | ||
![]() |
|
|