Game Mechanics: Mistwalker pets

Nizzarr · #1 12-30-2011, 11:43 PM

My scimitar of the mistwalker pet isnt taking weapons and not quadding.

A fix is in order imo!

Cast · #2 12-31-2011, 12:20 AM

Scim of Mistwalker should have 1hp, be unbuffable, and die after a round of attacks

sounds like the gms got it right, congrats on your sword.

Fazlazen · #3 12-31-2011, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Scim of Mistwalker should have 1hp, be unbuffable, and die after a round of attacks

sounds like the gms got it right, congrats on your sword.

you jelly ?

Cast · #4 12-31-2011, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fazlazen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you jelly ?

these forums are not for trolling, reported

Nizzarr · #5 12-31-2011, 02:19 AM

unbuffable, die after a round of attacks mistwalker is kunark era.

SORRY TO DISSAPOINT CAST, YOUZ GONNA BE EATEN BY XIBOBER!

Cast · #6 12-31-2011, 02:38 AM

I'd never be caught dying to a pet with that name, maybe something starting with a J...

Cast · #7 12-31-2011, 05:43 AM

Elderan, from FoH - first level 60 when kunark came out, posting in Nov 1999:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...a3be111ffa45e9

Proof from Nov 1999, thanks. Nice work on keeping it classic and classy, GM staff. Nizzar, I realize you didn't actually play in 1999, so I ask you to please refrain from speaking when us adults are talking.

Reikerx · #8 12-31-2011, 05:58 AM

Please explain how changes made 8 months after the launch of EQ are relevant on this 1 month old server.

Sounds like you lost the race to Vox like you lost the race to everything else and are once again crying and making shit up to make up for your growing disadvantage.

In the meantime, reported for trolling in a bug report.

Back on topic: Mistwalker should be able to wield weapons when given them. At the moment, it does not.

Cast · #9 12-31-2011, 06:46 AM

I'm much too lazy to dig down to any deeper level than November 1999, after it got hit with its 4th patch to attempt to balance the item, vox wasn't killed in a month circa 1999, this isn't exclusively classic server, yatta yatta yatta no reason to play these games. I know, and hopefully the GMs know, any version other than what I have listed below is imbalanced which is why they corrected it over and over again. Lets drag up the whole charm and fear were in classic eq, and so was the ability to loot a players corpse on rallos even after dying to a mob. No thanks-

I'll repeat my initial post in this thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Scim of Mistwalker should have 1hp, be unbuffable, and die after a round of attacks

sounds like the gms got it right, congrats on your sword.

Also let us not forget the completely erroneous information below:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

unbuffable, die after a round of attacks mistwalker is kunark era.

Daldaen · #10 12-31-2011, 02:09 PM

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ght=mistwalker

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[*]Kanras: Fixed bug where some mistwalker pets would only do bash/kick damage[*]Kanras: Mistwalker pets will now depop after one round of combat.

Note that change. It isn't because it was incorrect on blue, its because it fit into the timeline. It being OP doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed to be classic... see Manastone for example.

I hate to say it, but the previous poster was right, you just seem butthurt for whatever reason.