Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2012, 12:14 PM
kprobe kprobe is offline
Aviak

kprobe's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Opera
Posts: 88
Default Proposed Balance to New Rules

Summary
-Raid zones are places with no pvp limit (solb, planes, etc). Current rules remain elsewhere.
-Raid zones are a no-gm help area, except for hacks, exploits, and boxing enforcement

To help zone control:
-no binding in raid zones
-any character that is FD, can be casted/hit to cause mobs to re-agro. Each train now is a risk of PvE xp loss. This can only be sustained for so long.


Details
From what I gather, the GMs/admins of this server want it to be healthy so they wish to impose rules to protect NEW players. High-end players wish for there to be less rules, so that pvp can happen without waiting for GM approval in gray areas.

In general if you are entering a raid-zone, you aren't going alone, you have group support and you're assuming the risks. These are not new players and will not be driven away easily. What would become legal is training, but without binding in zone, you can enforce effective zone control via choking and stopping FD (risk-free) trains from happening.

This will also leave GMs more time to answer petitions outside to new players and enforcing no-training/excessive behaviour outside these highly contested zones.

In my opinion high-end pvp has always been about zone-control, we just have to ensure people have the tools to respond in kind, and balance out the cost of trains(harder to do, costlier).

Thoughts?
__________________
Phantom <Azrael>
Former good times with <Red Dawn><Neriak Chess Club><Vae Victus><Founding Fathers><Los Banditos><Blood Money> fighting the Zerg.
  #2  
Old 03-06-2012, 02:38 PM
aerokella aerokella is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 161
Default

Trains should never be legal. How can anyone say it is a viable tactic in "PVP."

Isnt PvP "Player Vs. Player?".. Not "Player verses Player, vs mobs at the same time?"

Engaging someone that is in combat is one thing (cool with me) but dropping 50 mobs on a bunch of peoples heads just to waste hours of work is.... retarded....

have some common sense and decency for gods sake.
  #3  
Old 03-06-2012, 03:11 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Can somebody please tell me what's wrong with just keeping training illegal? Are there any guides that have said, "man, training is so hard to enforce, I wish it were legal so that I could have more time to do other things"?

As for disabling binding in raid zones, let's just try the classic solution first (making casters respawn oom). Nilbog said in IRC that this was coming soon I think. Maybe Fear should have binding disabled but apart from that there are no zones that should have binding disabled that didn't already have it disabled in classic.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #4  
Old 03-06-2012, 03:14 PM
bakkily bakkily is offline
Planar Protector

bakkily's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: A desert
Posts: 1,164
Default

sounds good to me, though it'll be awhile until im lvl 40+
__________________
  #5  
Old 03-06-2012, 03:44 PM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can somebody please tell me what's wrong with just keeping training illegal?
For one, i cant root some guy trying to train me and lulz my ass off watching him die in half a second.
  #6  
Old 03-06-2012, 03:47 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Another terrible "let me train" post.
  #7  
Old 03-06-2012, 03:49 PM
Tassador Tassador is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,903
Default

I wonder what the rules are for pvp in starwars?
  #8  
Old 03-06-2012, 04:06 PM
Slave Slave is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassador [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I wonder what the rules are for pvp in starwars?
I would be utterly fucking shocked if in this day and age, they didn't have game mechanics in place to take care of pretty much everything automatically. It should be so easy to just program your way out of all the gigantic trial-and-error fuckups Sony made with Everquest after 10+ years of this genre.

If it's in the game, it should be in the game.
  #9  
Old 03-06-2012, 05:40 PM
Silikten Silikten is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 859
Default

I like it!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiegi 2.0 View Post
oh geez more friedchicken corpse, have he no honor
  #10  
Old 03-06-2012, 05:44 PM
steaks6 steaks6 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 106
Default

shut the fuck up , no one cares

stop making these threads about what you think the rules should be , you are not in charge

play , or dont
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.