|
|
#4
02-01-2012, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
At first I was really upset with blizzard that this game got pushed back yet again (like 4th time at least) from the expected launch date of 2/12. Then, however, I calmed down and realized that most every hyped game out there is a total let down on release simply because it's not complete on launch. I think very few companies would sacrifice income in order to tweak game design so it's as close to perfect as it can be. It's kind of nice to see a company placing the integrity of its product above the quarterly statement (even if it's only to a small degree).
As a Diablo fan, and fan of computer games in general, I definitely appreciate that and hope for sure when the release date comes it will be everything we all expect it to be. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
02-01-2012, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
The beta sucks.
__________________
 it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
02-01-2012, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
I think Blizzard is the only company that doesn't invite me to their beta tests.
I've beta tested nearly every AAA MMORPG and most multiplayer FPS in the past decade, few exceptions really. I'm patiently waiting for Diablo 3 to consume what little free time I got. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
02-04-2012, 02:42 AM
|
|||
|
Heh. I forgot about Diablo.
/reads about Diablo III. | ||
|
|
|||
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
