![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() In an era of exploitation and greed he came, and, with his band of merry men, ensured that affordable regeneration was available to all. Then, his mission accomplished, he returned to the realm of the gods (Veeshan's Peak) promising that should greed and tyranny ever return, so would he to fight for just prices once again.
Time passed, and the greedy among us once again grew bold. A new darkness has covered ec tunnel, and one question is on the minds of the gentle smallfolk. Where is our hero? | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() Nah meant to post this in general chat, disregard you elites of FE and TMO! (Save our hero and his crew)
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() I'm flattered
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() Cheaters should never be given a second chance. They knew what they were doing was wrong when they did it and likely would repeat their actions if given the chance. Cheaters are peiple with flawed values and morals. There is no reason to expect that a 2nd chance is magically going to change that flawed character trait.
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() So a person with a felony irl shouldnt be given a second chance.
What your saying is dumb. But just like irl, I think it depends on what the ban is for to be given a second chance. | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() Felony could mean rape/murder or theft over 1000 dollars.
That isn't an appropriate comparison. Proof of RMT on p99 = the server is shut down. If I was head gm of p99 I wouldn't risk my hard work for a few bad players who can't play within the rules. That's like a judge in court saying ok sir I know you are a rapist but you can leave jail if you promise not to rape anyone again. It doesn't work like that. | ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() I'm gonna guess you never been to jail.
What I'm saying is way over your head I guess. Like I said though, in my opinion it depends on what the ban is for. | ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() i agree with bouncer, but a proven MQ2 user is not the person for this argument.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() about 360 people. and any of them would not prove your point any better.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
![]() |
|
|