![]() |
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
|
![]() "Hey bro this isn't censorship, I'm not putting you in jail or anything, I'm just seeing to it that your audience is reduced from millions to zero." is a paper thin excuse, in other words. Lawyerese it all you want.
Libs need to drop the act that they totes support free speech, it's just that they have a million exceptions to it. You clearly don't believe in it, you clearly think you have the moral authority to relieve other people of the responsibility of hearing what they might hear and deciding for themselves if it's credible. You're not everyone's mom and dad. This is why people are calling you authoritarian lunatics. Nobody on the right wants left wing media personalities kicked off the air or deprived of their audience, even though they think their ideas are batshit insane and actively harmful. What an interesting asymmetry between the sides. | ||
Last edited by Ooloo; 01-30-2022 at 03:21 PM..
|
|
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
|
![]() Quote:
Biden's AG wants big tech to nuke rogan. I'm a citizen. I want to hear what his guests have to say. Biden's AG doesn't think I should. But, somehow, I should not feel as if censorship is occuring. That'd just be silly. | |||
|
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
|
![]() Quote:
So yes, dems are counting on the fact that hopefully by some miracle of legal technicality, they aren't "pressuring" anyone. Statements like "social media companies need to step up and stop the spread of misinformation on their platforms" coming from the state are not "pressure", technically, you see. | |||
|
|
![]() Quote:
And none btw! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Ctrl F garland has no results? | |||
|
![]() |
|
|