Raid Changes

[Ferok]

Competing for spawns, whether it's the shin lord or trakanon, is essential classic everquest.

[Arrisard]

Over all good changes. I'd go every other week, but that isn't too big of deal I guess. Limiting the repops to certain hours though is very disappointing.

[Splorf22]

So one random idea: every tick the server has a chance to respawn, and that chance proportional to the number of players online.

[Thana8088]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess we'll find out which system is more popular if the Sleeper server ever launches.

Well, have fun there and don't bother writing. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The vast majority of TMO may be against it. I'm sure it would be tough to see people beating content with 12 people that takes them 40. I think I've seen one or maybe two non TMO come out against instanced content / tokens. I guess we'll find out which system is more popular if the Sleeper server ever launches.

Orruar, I generally respect your posts. I've often found that when I go to post about something that you've, quite eloquently, beaten me to the punch. You're generally level headed and well spoken and I tend to agree with much of your analysis.

I must agree with Elethia that some of your recent posts have been unbecoming of you and your blanket statements very much beneath your typical style.

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The vast majority of TMO may be against it. I'm sure it would be tough to see people beating content with 12 people that takes them 40. I think I've seen one or maybe two non TMO come out against instanced content / tokens. I guess we'll find out which system is more popular if the Sleeper server ever launches.

It may or may not be more popular, but I don't think instances really fit with classic EQ.

[bizzum]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sure it would be tough to see people beating content with 12 people that takes them 40.

Wat

What content requires 40?

[quido]

dick taters

[Nordenwatch]

You did it loraen!

[Xanthias]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a continuation from the other thread ( http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=86005 ).

We will be implementing an FTE notice of some sort, whether this is an emote or some type of message.

Is there a way to code it so when the FTE hits a /who is done at the same time.
Just as a way to prevent FTE sniping from taking place.

If Guild A has 40 in zone and going for Trak, Guild B's ranger fires an arrow just as Guild A is about to engage. Guild B gets FTE, but they have no one in zone cept the sad lil ranger. Guild A kills gets loot because they killed the mob, but the FTE log will show they didn't have FTE even though the other guild didn't have a kill force.