|
#1
|
|||
|
Why nerf spell damage
What was so broken about spell damage that lead to them nerfing it to 60% or whatever it is? I wasn’t around back then so I really don’t know…
Were casters just so OP compared to melee when it really came down to it? It just seems really harsh to wizards who have little else going for them than spell damage.
__________________
- monstra sunt vera, nos sunt
| ||
#2
|
|||
|
Yeah.
It's dumb. And unclassic. | ||
#3
|
|||
|
unmitigated spell damage is extremely high compared to player hp in every single era except for top end velious gearing
wizards are very good despite the damage nerf | ||
#4
|
|||
|
Prolly cuz wizards can one shot people with ice comet while melee in classic are hitting you for 19 damage.
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Casters OP except top end kunark and then top velious they’re lamed a bit versus super high resists full dragon person but still shred normal geared people (mostly) | |||
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
leveling up or fighting mobs wizards never stop being good. Big shit storm battles with aggressive prepared enemies you might get a kill then be OOM and run away lame. That’s what I mean by the way things shift with dragon geared kunark melees and moreso with velious, in favor of the melee. But you’re right I don’t play enough, tho I think in this case it’s more about what we mean by best. | |||
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
#10
|
|||
|
soy vey
| ||
|
|