|
#1
|
|||||
|
A Female Only Draft
Recently there has been some controversy about women being added to the U.S. Armed Services Draft (link). The obvious extension of US feminist ideology, is a military where women are represented roughly proportional to the population. Especially in an era where women can preform just as well in the vast majority of military roles as men.
But this doesn't stop this policy from shocking the shit out of some people: Quote:
Quote:
IMO the policy doesn't go far enough. We need compulsory service for the female population in the U.S. It isn't necessary for the male population, we get enough volunteers to do what the female population isn't as prime at. Only 17% of the Military is currently women. We need a vast increase in female enlistment to realize a military more representative of the U.S. population. Meanwhile, women in the United States need discipline and direction. A lot of women have problems being too timid in professional settings and lead to a shortage of females in leadership positions. Military background has been shown to help people become more forceful and competent in this regard. It will nip the problem with fatness in the bud. In addition, women have problems working together as well as men do. Office bullying is always disproportionately female on female. Women are always competitive with one another -- but are unable to openly process this among themselves the way men do. So it comes out in sick twisted and/or passive aggressive ways. Military training should do a lot to teach women to work together as a team. And also get used to the fact the world doesn't revolve around them. Therefore, they are less likely to end up like these old out of it boomer bitches. You know -- that cunt obliviously in everyone's way in the middle of the store isle. I just think if they were in the military -- they would be a little more apt at not being a California roadblock in every grocery store. | ||||
Last edited by JurisDictum; 09-03-2021 at 04:29 AM..
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
its simple
women cant handle combat - they just aren't physically nor mentally cut out for it...no amount of training can change it keep them in the rear with the gear to appease the SJWs and nothing more | ||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
See: Roman history
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Men and women are different, they aren't interchangeable accross every domain. It's really pretty simple.
There are three possibilities: Women are either better at war, exactly the same at war, or worse at war. Given that they are biologically weaker than men physically, they are likely worse at war, and you want the strongest military possible. Simple simple, baddabing, issue settled. | ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Anyway, a lady draft is why the ERA failed to get ratified. | |||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Female snipers killed thousands of germans. Would be hilarious if a female beat you to death in some drunken/drug fueled incident at your local bar. You guys ought to challenge a pro fighter thats female, i mean since you're all snipers and berserker warriors.
| ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
We're talking about averages, because the military is comprised of hundreds of thousands of people, not two people. You don't understand how statistics and per capita work. The number 1 ranked female tennis player would get destroyed by a male highschool student. This is why it is so unfair to have transgender women (biological men) competing in women's sports. The trans agenda is going to basically erase female athletic achievement. And btw I'm not against female soldiers, provided they can pass all the same physical and mental tests the male recruits can. I mean seriously, why do you think there are weight divisions in MMA? This tells you everything you need to know. Also "would be hilarious if somebody beat you to death" is not a good phrase to put out there when trying to not appear psychotic. Seriously man let go of your anger, it's creepy. | |||
Last edited by Ooloo; 09-03-2021 at 08:46 AM..
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
Humans are tool users. Women are better at using tools.
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Well yeah it's largely beep-boop computing now, but it's not 100% beep-boop computing. And when the beep-boop computers get nuked or something, how will combat ensue? Oh yeah hand-to-hand or gun-to-gun. So you're gonna want men.
And again I support female soldiers if that's what they want to do with their lives, provided they can pass the same tests. I don't think that's some kind of radical position. | ||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|