Quote:
Originally Posted by Canelek
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They are often used in place of omitted letters such as do not becoming don't.
|
This is called a contraction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canelek
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I do not believe they are intended to shorten a past tense word.
|
You're correct in this belief - they aren't, and never will be. I don't particularly mind when people do this conversationally because I'm not an obnoxious pedant (not suggesting you are either), but I do make a passive mental note about someone when they do it. "Ah, this person doesn't know how to write very well in the English language." No biggie. Lots of people have the same problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canelek
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That said, duoed is indeed not a human word. Soloed, however, is.
|
On that note, it's also technically incorrect to use apostrophes (not apostrophe's) for pluralization - e.g., "I grew up in the '90s" is correct, while "I grew up in the 90's" is not. "I won seven CoFs today" is correct, while "I won seven CoF's today" is not. Apostrophes, unless used as a contraction, should generally only be used to denote possession, except when used as a quotation mark or arbitrarily in a formal title - e.g., "Caiu totally ganked Aftermath's Bladestopper while they were trying to recharge it."