Sebilite Protector Camp Rule Clarification

[Teppler]

He's a 2 hr 45 min spawn. He has a roamer that spawns in his same path.

If you engage the roamer, can someone else pull the protector?

I'm talking to a few different people that regularly do the camp and I'm getting various answers. And tensions are running high.

Yesterday a group and I were finishing off the roaming golem and about to engage the Prot when another duo sniped him.

This morning a duo pulled roamer and I'm questioning if I could take Prot w/ a duo and it would be by the rules. The guy who is doing the roamer is absolutely livid at the suggestion.

I just looking for some consistent ruling on how this works.

[Phenyo]

Gonna guess that if you're socking the lair and keeping the roamer down waiting for prot then you are 'camping' it. If its up and nothing is clear its FFA.

[Ruhtar]

Sounds like you were just breaking into the camp or not keeping the spawns down. Either way, you lost.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Ruhtar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sounds like you were just breaking into the camp or not keeping the spawns down. Either way, you lost.

It’s fine either way I just want it consistent cause I was in the situation in reverse this morning. A duo starting clearing roamer and I could skip ahead with my duo partner in the same way and snipe the prot? Definitely no recourse against the snipers in this case?

Let me give another example of this and your thoughts- let’s say a group is clearing to crypt and somebody is following them. The group is clearing all the mobs and is basically there. The follower invises himself past 1 mob the group has to deal with and plops on the most valuable ph in the camp. No recourse against the follower who plopped on the ph right? This would be the same situation I feel.

[Phenyo]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It’s fine either way I just want it consistent cause I was in the situation in reverse this morning. A duo starting clearing roamer and I could skip ahead with my duo partner in the same way and snipe the prot? Definitely no recourse against the snipers in this case?

Let me give another example of this and your thoughts- let’s say a group is clearing to crypt and somebody is following them. The group is clearing all the mobs and is basically there. The follower invises himself past 1 mob the group has to deal with and plops on the most valuable ph in the camp. No recourse against the follower who plopped on the ph right? This would be the same situation I feel.

If the group has not killed/is keeping the PH down they have no claim to the camp, even if they are clearing in. Allowed? yes. Dick move? maybe.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Phenyo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the group has not killed/is keeping the PH down they have no claim to the camp, even if they are clearing in. Allowed? yes. Dick move? maybe.

This is how I interpreted it. Allowed but really big jerk move. But this seems to be the way the Sebilite Protector camp is moving towards. Very cutthroat. Tensions are starting to run high.

The way it works is the protector has about a 90-95% success rate for killing if you know what you’re doing and you have time to clear stuff. If you leave roamer up, that drops to like I’d say 60-66% success rate. A lot more dangerous. But I guess anyone has to be very careful now if you are clearing roamer and plan to do prot.

[kylok]

Originally Posted by Phenyo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the group has not killed/is keeping the PH down they have no claim to the camp, even if they are clearing in. Allowed? yes. Dick move? maybe.

^ thems the rules as far as I know.

[Synthlol]

Originally Posted by Phenyo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the group has not killed/is keeping the PH down they have no claim to the camp, even if they are clearing in. Allowed? yes. Dick move? maybe.

Protector doesn't have a placeholder.

[Phenyo]

Originally Posted by Synthlol [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Protector doesn't have a placeholder.

My post was directed at the hypothetical he proposed.

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me give another example of this and your thoughts- let’s say a group is clearing to crypt and somebody is following them. The group is clearing all the mobs and is basically there. The follower invises himself past 1 mob the group has to deal with and plops on the most valuable ph in the camp. No recourse against the follower who plopped on the ph right? This would be the same situation I feel.

In the case of the protector I would assume it follows a similar ruleset to lucan in that if you are actively clearing the area/room with intent to kill the protector you have right to the mob when it spawns. However if its just up it would be first to engage.

[Legidias]

Depends where roamer spawns