The line for JCP is a terrible concept

[Asher]

Originally Posted by Dantes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If your VS faction is good, you won't even be KOS in HS. Zoning in is a non-issue.

Even with good faction to VS you were still KoS to mobs in the zone. Same as having good RoF faction doesn't help you against trash in Skyfire, nor did good VS faction save you from KC mobs past the 2nd bridge. I realize it isn't this way on this server but even all dogs past the bridge should be KoS to everyone.

Asher

[Amelinda]

Originally Posted by Chanur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One would think you would get more things correct then.

And here I thought you were a nice guy....You petitioned your own name and I didn't suspend you though I could have.......Just changed it.

I am disappointed that you are a troll. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Dantes]

Originally Posted by Asher [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even with good faction to VS you were still KoS to mobs in the zone. Same as having good RoF faction doesn't help you against trash in Skyfire, nor did good VS faction save you from KC mobs past the 2nd bridge. I realize it isn't this way on this server but even all dogs past the bridge should be KoS to everyone.

Asher

Well, we're talking about P99 here. So on this server the majority of mobs in HS are on the VS faction. You can run around down there and explore all you want without being attacked. So just about anybody with decent VS faction can zone into HS without any fear of death. I'm sure there might be KOS mobs there, but not the ones at the zone in.

[baalzy]

Originally Posted by Asher [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even with good faction to VS you were still KoS to mobs in the zone. Same as having good RoF faction doesn't help you against trash in Skyfire, nor did good VS faction save you from KC mobs past the 2nd bridge. I realize it isn't this way on this server but even all dogs past the bridge should be KoS to everyone.

Asher

Edit: Nevermind, reading comprehension is my friend.

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why is everyone acting like that screenshot is so damning, anyway? Like my bff Rejuvenation I believe that (judging from the screenshot) the correct decision was made. So far no one has given a reason why the decision was incorrect, instead they've just posted that screenshot as if it alone constitutes proof.

From what I understand, the problem was that one gm/guide came in and took an item from a player and gave it to another player without first hearing arguments from both sides or doing the petition research to make an informed decision.

More than four hours earlier, to solve a dispute involving Twizzt and Bearnuts about who was ahead in line. Amelinda was "hands off" and told the players to resolve the dispute. Instead of a compromise or making an agreement, bearnuts KS'd the mob in question and gave the prod to a necro buddy and then remained there stating he was first in line. This caused Twizzt to immediately petition the KS but there was no answer to the petition at all - four hours later another chancellor pops. Twizzt attacks this mob because he beleives its his rightful mob since bearnuts KS'd him on the last mob that was rightfully his. Twizzt gets the kill with no contest because Bearnuts went LD for that moment. Twizzt takes prod and leaves. Bearnuts comes back from LD and has Uthgaard there immediately. Then you see how things were resolved by the screenshots. Essentially Bearnuts got two prods in a row, which is why this seems to have been handled poorly.

Again, this is just from what information I was able to gather.

[booter]

Originally Posted by Amelinda [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because obviously none of the dev's OR Guides played on live....

I personally didn't play from 1999 until 2006....not at all.....didn't play on 3 different servers up to 60 with multiple characters either......OWAIT

Fairly sure several of the devs actually met on live. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If many of the devs played on live during this time and participated in killing Trakanon, they should also be joining the voices of the many people here who also remember it being a three day spawn. Just look at the thread about it in the bugs section (I think) - there is a LOT of evidence posted about his spawn time - Afterlife's DKP page, posts on Allas, EQCasters, etc. I mean, this is probably the single most documented non-classic thing on P1999 where a TON of the playerbase here killed him when he was a three day spawn.

[muffins]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From what I understand, the problem was that one gm/guide came in and took an item from a player and gave it to another player without first hearing arguments from both sides or doing the petition research to make an informed decision.

More than four hours earlier, to solve a dispute involving Twizzt and Bearnuts about who was ahead in line. Amelinda was "hands off" and told the players to resolve the dispute. Instead of a compromise or making an agreement, bearnuts KS'd the mob in question and gave the prod to a necro buddy and then remained there stating he was first in line. This caused Twizzt to immediately petition the KS but there was no answer to the petition at all - four hours later another chancellor pops. Twizzt attacks this mob because he beleives its his rightful mob since bearnuts KS'd him on the last mob that was rightfully his. Twizzt gets the kill with no contest because Bearnuts went LD for that moment. Twizzt takes prod and leaves. Bearnuts comes back from LD and has Uthgaard there immediately. Then you see how things were resolved by the screenshots. Essentially Bearnuts got two prods in a row, which is why this seems to have been handled poorly.

Again, this is just from what information I was able to gather.

This is exactly right. I have had similar problems with said GM taking a manastone out of my inventory because I picked it up off the ground from someone who decided it was a good idea to drop it down right infront of me. This certainly isn't classic, yet they are going for a classic like feel on this server. I believe this dev should no longer be allowed to answer to any more petitions as they have proven many times before that they are incapable of being just.

[baalzy]

Originally Posted by booter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If many of the devs played on live during this time and participated in killing Trakanon, they should also be joining the voices of the many people here who also remember it being a three day spawn. Just look at the thread about it in the bugs section (I think) - there is a LOT of evidence posted about his spawn time - Afterlife's DKP page, posts on Allas, EQCasters, etc. I mean, this is probably the single most documented non-classic thing on P1999 where a TON of the playerbase here killed him when he was a three day spawn.

Lets also not forget about the rarity of the fungus tunic. Another extremely well documented and well remembered aspect of classic.

Or the fact that even pre-nerf(on p99) the robe of living fungus was implemented incorrectly and had the +15 regen effect on it instead of the clicky fungal regrowth spell that the staff has. Hell, the evidence used to provide a date for when to nerf the robe even very clearly stated that it was a spell effect.

[Kuriin]

I volunteer at a clinic that deals with sharp instruments as well as blood. Can I stab people with tainted needles because I'm just a volunteer and not a paid worker? I mean, I should be able to, right? I mean, I'm allowed to be a prick to all of them because Uthgaard does, right? I am volunteering my precious time to be there, so I should, yes?

[Shiftin]

Lol. The fungus tunic rarity has been fixed for over a week guys.