![]() |
|
#421
|
|||
|
Bump
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#422
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't know how to finish the sentence, and I don't think I really have to, either :P
__________________
"Pleasure writes fewer good songs..."
Red99 | |||
|
|
||||
|
#423
|
|||
|
I used pretty sound logic, I'm sorry you were unable to grasp it. I do teach the LSAT though, and I can offer you a competitive rate as a red99 player.
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#425
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#426
|
|||
|
Stinkum great example of someone who can't grasp pretty simple logic. People in this thread used the argument that because a person of authority has endorsed a certain rule that therefore the rule is correct and should not be questioned. I extrapolated this logic to day to day life to show that such an approach is ludicrous. If you would question nonsensical rules in your day to day life, why wouldn't you here as well? [the answer is because the rule here "punishes" someone they don't like, and they are hiding behind faulty logic]
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#428
|
|||
|
/yawn pretty bad troll, keep on avoiding the issue pal
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
|
|||
|
#429
|
|||
|
step away from the keyboard hb
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|