![]() |
|
#231
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I'm sure if a guild council is established and then the guild council deems a guild as breaking the rules in a majority that the staff would look into it as well and then hand down punishment that the players have agreed upon and accepted. Every guild would have to be subject to penalties that they choose for themselves, I see no reason why the staff wouldn't hold them to their own agreed choices.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#232
|
||||
|
Quote:
maintaining a guild of 100 raiders is not fun, not productive. I would really enjoy 3 more raiding guilds with 25 Solid players who are trying to achieve perfection and the best raid strats etc. When you get people really trying hard to maximum kills with low numbers you will bring the community together rather than just try to LOLZERG. I know that there would be no stall tanking, FTE sniping, etc cause you cannot engage unless u are 100% ready. To be honest, Id rather just rotate everything so I can have fun trying to be the "best" gamer i can be rather than throwing warm bodies at encounters. 95% of all raiders on this server are unhappy. I would guess we can make a lot more people have a lot more fun by limiting the zerg and pushing for a skill based system. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#233
|
|||
|
Let Lron declare Jihad. And have them run this agreement by a 'council' of p99 players who aren't really invested in the raid scene. Get some impartiality here, and some transparency.
And some answers. That being said, this is an interesting social experiment going on.[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#235
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#236
|
|||
|
Gonna be a lot of smaller guilds sprouting up and they're going to want targets too.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#237
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Basically, there isn't a guild on this server that could pull that off without it getting out. TMO has already been made an example when it comes to this, 2 players nearly killed the entire guild with staff punishment. As long as the next rule breakers will be treated more severely than that (considering they'd be doing this as a guild) then I doubt you'll see the problem ever arise.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#238
|
|||
|
This all happened because guilds were monopolizing content. They agree to straight up give away mobs, like all the time. And people are outraged at such an insult and want so much more. Can't even believe what I'm reading tonight.
I thought it was going too far to back off completely on those priority mobs for a week. No waiting period, no exceptions. Not to mention draco and Talendor are still huge targets for us. We still have to compete with TMO for anything that we kill while nobody else does. I'm going to have to look into this points system or whatever you guys are talking about. I don't know how it can be worse for us then this proposal. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#240
|
|||||
|
Quote:
"Giving up a weeks worth of mobs was tough on us." Really? Just stop. Bump a proposal that doesn't favor the top end.. Again.
__________________
Quote:
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT. Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard | ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|