|
|
#51
01-29-2014, 11:48 AM
|
||||
|
I guess its not really a big deal I was just curious as to how it would be handled. What if several groups come in the pl group would be forced to share at a certain point, or should be.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#53
01-29-2014, 12:04 PM
|
|||
|
Eh I dunno. I am of the opinion whatever amount of mobs you can feasibly kill and lock down with your group and keep them killed regularly after respawns, you should be able to claim as your camp and not share.
But this is all hypothetical since Chardok will never see 3 groups there simultaneously doing something other than AEing or Royals. Until perhaps the Chardok revamp when people want those new clickies and stuff.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#54
01-29-2014, 12:15 PM
|
||||
|
I don't really see it happening either and since the dok revamp isnt until the end of velious it shouldnt be an issue then.
I was really just wondering how it would be handled i know in zones like a guk necros that can clear all named have to pick what camp they want when more zone in. Just didn't know if that applied here
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#55
01-29-2014, 12:27 PM
|
|||
|
LGuk you are only sniping named though. Chardok they aren't doing any named just trash. Which is where I can see a difference being. Since Chardok doesn't have many true named atleast that the AEers pull, the motivation there is either random trash loot or exp (or both) which makes where you are killing irrelevant so long as you have a constant stream of mobs to pull from. Whereas named in LGuk have specific loot tables etc.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#57
01-30-2014, 02:29 AM
|
|||
|
Here's been my observation on the whole thing:
Suggest allowing multiboxing? NOT THAT IS NOT CLASSIC ENOUGH AND IT WILL ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR GROUPS AND NO ONE WILL GROUP OR TALK TO ANYONE ELSE The same argument is used for twinking, or for the "What class should I play? Necro or mage?" questions that pop up from time to time.... and on and on and on... the same argument pops up because we've all seen what happens in an MMO where everyone can solo to max level, ad what happens to those who don't want to play a pure solo class or twink out so hard that the only challenge is staying awake as you melee. But when you're not in the middle of some powerlevel circle jerk arrangement, and you wander into a zone LFG, and all you get are soulless blank faces running past you with snared trains instead of a response, it's like: What's the point of even playing EQ Classic? Go the fudge back to Firiona Vie and start a headshot/decap/swarm PL business, and leave this (notionally) superb server experience to people who actually want to group at camps together, just like we did in classic days. Go back to live if you can't control your need to PL for money or be PLd. (I mad) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#58
01-30-2014, 11:26 AM
|
|||
|
I could find you 10 threads from 2000-2001 on the Druid's Grove archive about the best places to PL for exp and money.
Shit's classic.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will> Manowarr - Druid Blue Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA> Shiroe - 60 Enchanter Manowarr - 60 Druid | ||
|
|
|||
|
#59
01-30-2014, 11:32 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#60
01-30-2014, 11:39 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
I grouped there once maybe twice on P99 during the AE skyfire days. And is solo there occasionally when I was bored. Other than the people I brought with me, I never ran into another soul there. It was a ghost town. And if AEing Chardok is unclassicly removed, it would go back to being a ghost town. People would do royals to sell cleric epic MQs and occasional warrior/enchanter epics. And the rare nostalgia group would pop up. But it being so far out of the way replacing anyone is impossible and a critical person leaving means the group is over.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
