![]() |
|
#101
|
|||
|
There's an extensive guide on the forum about researching the history of classic EQ and digging through the very deepest section of the intarwebs. If you can find posts from 2000 stating exactly how many pixels of a bubble the gnoll trade in filled, you might be on to something.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#102
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#104
|
|||
|
this is very similar to the us gov.. "we are unhappy with the actions of a few make more rule/laws because control makes me feel safe" ... fucking man up and go to a different camp.. it sucks but its way better then extra unnecessary rules because one person doesn't like that they cant get what they want
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#106
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#107
|
||||
|
Quote:
Personally I kind of think such a post should be stickied; might avoid a lot of posts in threads like this one. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#108
|
|||
|
Finding the already stickied thread on "How do I research" on your own is basically the first test on whether you should devote any time to this.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#109
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#110
|
||||
|
Thanks for that completely unhelpful response. Have you actually tried searching for that phrase here?
Quote:
And yes, it is stickied in the bug thread but obviously there are a lot of people who could potentialy help the project that don't venture far from this main forum. Let's make it as hard as possible for them to contribute! For everyone else's benefit the thread (that I still think should be stickied here in the main forum) is: http://www.project1999.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5570 | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|