![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
Monk Or Rogue or Ranger
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#32
|
|||
|
vageta made some good points on the Shaman.
You don't "have" to go Iksar to be a monk. There were people playing Monks for a long time before Kunark came out and never had any problems with it. My own Monk that I play is a Human. I prefer not to worry about time sinking faction changes just to get into towns safely.
__________________
Valarious - 24 Druid | Valdarious - 18 Monk | Maxilla - 21 Rogue | Corne - 10 Warrior (175 Blacksmithing) The thrill of adventuring and maxing my skills is how I like to play | ||
|
|
|||
|
#33
|
|||
|
Rogue is a pretty fun melee to play and not as demanding raid knowledge wise as monk and warrior.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#34
|
|||
|
I should perhaps mention that I might be alongside a cleric, should I ever reach that high of a level, which is why I dont think a shaman would fit well (double cleric type sounds kinda meh, imo) along with just preferring melee.
I've always wanted to try a ranger, I played one after being a raid tank on live for sometime and during the progression servers and had alot of fun with it. If it doesnt work, however, I guess I could tough it out as a shaman, but I dont like any of the looks on the other races (not to mention being a "large" race) Sorry for late responses, I was sick/work overload D: | ||
|
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||
|
A full group situation in say Sebilis, that a shaman that can focus only on debuff / buffing and not healing would be awesome for you and CLR wouldn't it? But yea duo'ing with 2 healers killing bandits would be slower.
On the other hand I'm loving ranger, but I'm only lvl 12 so. :P
__________________
Naraka - 25 Druid
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|