Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:10 PM
Kergan Kergan is offline
Planar Protector

Kergan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't see why we're supposed to push back the best loot dragon in the game to the best time zone for ex Nihi members mostly, you're dreaming.

We aren't recruiting, most mobs aren't high priority - PD you're gona have to work for it, that should be a given.

I wish GM's would do 5-11 PM 1 raid mob per week random spawn in that window - would be battle royal in diff zones every day.

Plus TBH I don't even see anyone trying to take the mobs to begin with or contest - Holo hasn't really shown up at all, when a guild does we won't really be giving them the Nihi treatment - this is all a bunch of crap.
Look dude lets just take PD off the table ok? You guys are in the same place we were for a long time, people pretty much have things they want and there is a big loot cockblock at PD. Zerg the fuck out of PD if you want. Kill it on repop. Make it spawn at 4AM on a Tuesday...whatever it takes to hold that mob.

If we remove PD from the equation can we move on to Colgate's points and see if they are feasible for your guild?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archalen View Post
Next thing I know he's low-HP running like a NPC but we blasted him down so hard I think his pussy came off.
  #212  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:14 PM
Kergan Kergan is offline
Planar Protector

Kergan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I want raid mobs left up so they will kill people wandering in their respective zones

8]

The threat of Inny aggroing through the floor is PoHate was real on live when sneaking along the wall. I miss it.
Nothing like seeing the Gore emote in DL and checking the zone list to see who is LD and about to get their shit pushed in.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archalen View Post
Next thing I know he's low-HP running like a NPC but we blasted him down so hard I think his pussy came off.
  #213  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:17 PM
Buhbuh Buhbuh is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,638
Default

read first 2 pages and saw that the initial post with a positive outlook and ideas was being construed as some form of way to get ahead and to make the server less enjoyable.

status quo, sounds good.

we'll bring it up again next month.
  #214  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:28 PM
Swyft Swyft is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Jersey
Posts: 562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Look dude lets just take PD off the table ok? You guys are in the same place we were for a long time, people pretty much have things they want and there is a big loot cockblock at PD. Zerg the fuck out of PD if you want. Kill it on repop. Make it spawn at 4AM on a Tuesday...whatever it takes to hold that mob.

If we remove PD from the equation can we move on to Colgate's points and see if they are feasible for your guild?
Why would they with you, have you ever addressed any of their valid points about Nihilum being negative for the server?

Why do you always expect more from other's than your willing to give yourself?
  #215  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:37 PM
Heyitsme Heyitsme is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swyft [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why would they with you, have you ever addressed any of their valid points about Nihilum being negative for the server?

Why do you always expect more from other's than your willing to give yourself?
Somebodys got a Nihilum tunnel vision problem

How about viewing the proposal from the point of the server's best interest, is it good viewing it from that viewpoint?

Would it help the server to not get locked in a situation where one guild dominates content for long periods of time?
  #216  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:42 PM
krazyGlue krazyGlue is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,759
Default

I vote no .
  #217  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:45 PM
krazyGlue krazyGlue is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,759
Default

On a srs note you pals want better timers but a handful of dragons in and out of vp stay up for days at a time .
Start with those first
  #218  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:45 PM
Swyft Swyft is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Jersey
Posts: 562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyitsme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Somebodys got a Nihilum tunnel vision problem

How about viewing the proposal from the point of the server's best interest, is it good viewing it from that viewpoint?

Would it help the server to not get locked in a situation where one guild dominates content for long periods of time?
Just a valid point, Colgate has the right to make such accusations, but Kergan defending him actually makes his post look hypocritical when you consider the kind of person who is backing him and the fact that Kergan only wants a logical response to propganda that personally benefits himself or the side of the fence he happens to be standing on atm.

If he wants unbiased responses then he needs to give some himself just once.
  #219  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:46 PM
Heyitsme Heyitsme is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 160
Default

Inb4 you dont play here why not move on

Even though i dont play here anymore i might play here and there once in a while and will probably play for at least a bit once velious is out.

Im in love with the idea of a 500+ player red server, because Rallos was so fun.

This is why i keep posting even though i technically dont play here, to get my 2 cents in about what i think would help the server grow.

I rip on Colgate when i think hes being an asshole but his proposal sure makes a lot of sense and id be an hypocrite ripping on it.

Now if people like Smedy can move on about "Nilly nuthuggers" and acknowledge that some in the alternatives guilds would push people into Nihilum, well be on to something.
  #220  
Old 09-11-2014, 11:00 PM
Swyft Swyft is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Jersey
Posts: 562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyitsme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Inb4 you dont play here why not move on

Even though i dont play here anymore i might play here and there once in a while and will probably play for at least a bit once velious is out.

Im in love with the idea of a 500+ player red server, because Rallos was so fun.

This is why i keep posting even though i technically dont play here, to get my 2 cents in about what i think would help the server grow.

I rip on Colgate when i think hes being an asshole but his proposal sure makes a lot of sense and id be an hypocrite ripping on it.

Now if people like Smedy can move on about "Nilly nuthuggers" and acknowledge that some in the alternatives guilds would push people into Nihilum, well be on to something.
Well it's just the fact that you did defend Nihilum at every turn on the boards, when they were the most detrimental thing to server pop. So when you say your for increasing server pop, but defended everything that kept server pop low, it's a little hard for people to swallow.

It's gonna take alil more than a month to turn over a new leaf, but if it's truly your intention I'm sure strong efforts will reward you with a new perception of your character.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.