religion

[iruinedyourday]

oh its about people that play eq that think they are smarter than Charles Darwin. I get it now, cool bro's.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what the fuck is going on in this thread I wonder.

Doesn't matter anymore. We hit 100 pages so I win.

[paulgiamatti]

I can tell Robot and Glenzig have at least taken into consideration the other side of the argument, but that doesn't excuse the absurdity of confusing evolutionary studies with religious theology and atheism with belief. No one needs to point out the fundamentally flawed thinking that leads to this, it's so painfully obvious that it warrants no further speculation or comment from anyone with even the faintest whiff of rationality.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including species, individual organisms and molecules such as DNA and proteins."

Even more so, what the hell are you going on about? He denied that as evolution. You are right though, I'm starting to think you are both the same poster..... LMAO

No, I didnt deny that as evolution...this is the 4th time I have pointed it out to you:

Speciation is the evolutionary process by which new biological species arise.

Did you miss that part? Should I increase the font size for you as well?

Here, I will explain it like you are a 5 year old so maybe, just maybe, you can wrap your tiny brain around it.

1. Driving a car is a process. Evolution is a process.
2. Specitation is part of the evolutionary process. Accelerating is part of process of driving a car.
3. You cant substitute the word "accelerating" with "driving" no more than you can substitute "evolution" with "speciation" even though they are subsets of those processes.

We call the subset of increasing your speed while driving, "accelerating" NOT driving for a VERY GOOD REASON.
We call the subset of producing new species, "speciation" NOT evolution FOR A VERY GOOD REASON.

Does that mean that driving doesnt exist or somehow it is negated by the word accelerating? NO! Does it mean that evolution doesnt happen because we call it's subset speciation? NO!

READING SKILLS...GET SOME DUMBASS.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can tell Robot and Glenzig have at least taken into consideration the other side of the argument, but that doesn't excuse the absurdity of confusing evolutionary studies with religious theology and atheism with belief. No one needs to point out the fundamentally flawed thinking that leads to this, it's so painfully obvious that it warrants no further speculation or comment from anyone with even the faintest whiff of rationality.

Research the origins of the theory and what drove the thinking behind it. You'll see.

[paulgiamatti]

Yeah, damn those theories! They've never done anything for us! Suck it, Einstein! Relativity shmrelativity.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I didnt deny that as evolution...this is the 4th time I have pointed it out to you:

Speciation is the evolutionary process by which new biological species arise.

Did you miss that part? Should I increase the font size for you as well?

Here, I will explain it like you are a 5 year old so maybe, just maybe, you can wrap your tiny brain around it.

1. Driving a car is a process. Evolution is a process.
2. Specitation is part of the evolutionary process. Accelerating is part of process of driving a car.
3. You cant substitute the word "accelerating" with "driving" no more than you can substitute "evolution" with "speciation" even though they are subsets of those processes.

We call the subset of increasing your speed while driving, "accelerating" NOT driving for a VERY GOOD REASON.
We call the subset of producing new species, "speciation" NOT evolution FOR A VERY GOOD REASON.

Does that mean that driving doesnt exist or somehow it is negated by the word accelerating? NO! Does it mean that evolution doesnt happen because we call it's subset speciation? NO!

READING SKILLS...GET SOME DUMBASS.

Lawls.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can tell Robot and Glenzig have at least taken into consideration the other side of the argument, but that doesn't excuse the absurdity of confusing evolutionary studies with religious theology and atheism with belief. No one needs to point out the fundamentally flawed thinking that leads to this, it's so painfully obvious that it warrants no further speculation or comment from anyone with even the faintest whiff of rationality.

You have no idea what I have or haven't read. You make this claim based off you not liking me at all. Don't make yourself look like a tool as much as you already have.

[Champion_Standing]

I feel bad for everyone in this thread.

/hug

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lawls.

I assume you are laughing at yourself since you have no response.