Catherins attempt at lawyering

[Aviann]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All of your opinions have become invalid as of this post.

lol pras

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's no rule on the books saying you can't engage a dragon that someone else is already engaged on

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

(this is relevant for velious faction hits btw) but the punishment was only levied based on an assumed violation.

But there is a rule about engaging a dragon that another guild is engaged on, Chest. As I pointed out earlier, if 3 or more members from another guild engage a target with another guild it is considered a joint raid. There was no 'assumed violation' there was an 'apparent violation'. Both words start with the letter "A" but I assure you their meanings are very different and very relevant.

And if you're so concerned with faction hits, buy shruikens or use some non-melee/dmg means.

[Juevento]

Seriously listen to CCR. They are the 60s version of that whiney bitch emo music.

[Raev]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sadad (who was the rep) wasn't even at the incident in question and I seriously doubt anyone had records of how many trackers we were using at the time. This was back before coth ducking became the regular plan so I'm pretty sure it was just a random tracker

So are you saying that it's possible that Taken and BDA each had one tracker (and thus would have been within the rules regardless) and that TMO did not prove otherwise in their petition with screenshots and such?

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So are you saying that it's possible that Taken and BDA each had one tracker (and thus would have been within the rules regardless) and that TMO did not prove otherwise in their petition with screenshots and such?

I hope that's not what Chest is saying! That would mean the leader of BDA is lying to the public! Both BDA and Taken admitted to having a total of 3 trackers between the two.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So are you saying that it's possible that Taken and BDA each had one tracker (and thus would have been within the rules regardless) and that TMO did not prove otherwise in their petition with screenshots and such?

That would be correct.

[Aviann]

Originally Posted by Juevento [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously listen to CCR. They are the 60s version of that whiney bitch emo music.

You obviously only heard one song if you think its whiney bitch emo music. Grow some ball hairs before you step up to a conversation like this, *****.

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That would be correct.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Juevento]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So are you saying that it's possible that Taken and BDA each had one tracker (and thus would have been within the rules regardless) and that TMO did not prove otherwise in their petition with screenshots and such?

Or tracking from the zone in as we usually do for naggy. Taken for sure had 2 trackers at that engage since they BP healed a warrior for fte until the troops show up.

But none of that is important. Chest what you need to realize is that Sirken and Deru are the problem here. They enable TMO to be TMO. If we had decent GMs around, those sociopaths would have been sent to the red gulag with the other scum to compete their hearts out.

This place is fucked. Come jack some peoples hard earned trade packs in Archeage.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Juevento [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously listen to CCR. They are the 60s version of that whiney bitch emo music.

Credence Clearwater Revival? I know that song. It's the one that's in all the movies about Vietnam, right?