Back to the bard

[Kergan]

Yeah there have been a few threads asking if anyone had played on SZ, they always get quite a few responses. This time we get the added benefit of Swyft proving once and for all he is a delusional non factor though. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah there have been a few threads asking if anyone had played on SZ, they always get quite a few responses. This time we get the added benefit of Swyft proving once and for all he is a delusional non factor though. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol the guy with zero solo kill in 20 years of being on EQ pvp servers calls someone else a non factor, and you call me delusional.

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by BardPop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You guys notice Swyft stopped talking about being #10 when he saw the link to the points board? Guess he was farther down the page then he thought, aw well not hard for a luclin wiz to burn people from 100% and get kills.

I was ranked in the top ten but it was during velious-early luclin era stop playing my wiz long before pop.

[Chronoburn]

Originally Posted by Swyft [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

God I hope so by that point Darkenbane had been disbanded as a guild and 90% of it's members had been playing on Legends for 8 months. LOL took your guild 8 months to beat a guild in pts that had been gone or inactive almost a year.

Like I said ToW were blues who only fought over raid mobs. But gratz on winning pt boards when everyone was playing Shadowbane/Legends.

So 90% of the players from the best pvp guild ever was on a 40$/month blue server? Makes sense.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030602...sz_summary.jsp

Honorbound, essentially a non-raiding - pvp only guild, had less points than a guild who only fought over raid mobs? Also makes a ton sense.

Are you sure you played on SZ?

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Chronoburn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So 90% of the players from the best pvp guild ever was on a 40$/month blue server? Makes sense.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030602...sz_summary.jsp

Honorbound, essentially a non-raiding - pvp only guild, had less points than a guild who only fought over raid mobs? Also makes a ton sense.

Are you sure you played on SZ?

Well a lot of players who are all about raid mobs try to claim to be pvp'ers but In my mind a true pvper has a shit ton of solo kills. Which secludes the vast majority of tow from being considered good pvp'ers. Although there were a few descent pvper's they primarily acted as a zerg and resorted to superior numbers to win.

[toolshed]

Originally Posted by Swyft [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

primarily acted as a zerg and resorted to superior numbers to win.

uh you were on the evil side too right? The one with 70% server population? hahaah

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by toolshed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

uh you were on the evil side too right? The one with 70% server population? hahaah

I said I was newt like 5 times, TOW was the only newt guild that played like evil's they never went anywhere alone much like Hate.

[toolshed]

Well i guess the cat is out of the bag about me not reading any of your posts

[Stasis01]

Originally Posted by toolshed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well i guess the cat is out of the bag about me not reading any of your posts

ur not alone.

[derpcake]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]