Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-28-2015, 10:36 AM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vallanor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just for clarification, let's say a guild claims Trak and has 20 members hanging out in Seb. There's nothing stopping the remaining members of that guild from FTE'ing to their heart's content elsewhere as long as they also maintain a presence at Trak, correct?
Correct.

This is why I'm wary of setting the raid force threshold too low. Not because I don't want AG to suffer. But because I want claiming a target to have real implications for the guild and to offer real opportunities to other guilds. It might be so, if put in place, that guilds don't as a practical matter go out and take tons of other targets while leaving their claim crew behind. But I suppose if the raid thresholds are low across the board, then it would be easier for smaller guilds to claim targets, and there would be fewer unclaimed targets to contest.

Not gonna edit out the stream of consciousness. Yes, you are correct.
  #42  
Old 10-28-2015, 10:49 PM
teija teija is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 188
Default

This thread is a complete waste of time I am sry to tell you all. Anything thats going to require more rules/GM enforcement/frapsquest/petitionquest will never be implemented.
  #43  
Old 10-28-2015, 10:58 PM
Sadre Spinegnawer Sadre Spinegnawer is offline
Planar Protector

Sadre Spinegnawer's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teija [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This thread is a complete waste of time I am sry to tell you all. Anything thats going to require more rules/GM enforcement/frapsquest/petitionquest will never be implemented.
Just go with it. Use the power of imagination. The magic of "what if?" is awesome!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

edit: leash Velious dragons plz
__________________
go go go
  #44  
Old 10-28-2015, 11:58 PM
maestrom maestrom is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teija [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This thread is a complete waste of time I am sry to tell you all. Anything thats going to require more rules/GM enforcement/frapsquest/petitionquest will never be implemented.
Just curious. What specific scenarios are you imagining that will make FIF require more petition/GM involvement than the current system?

I imagine that in the short run, yes. More staff will need to be involved as guilds learn to adjust to a new system. But in the long run there should be nothing to petition in most cases.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.