Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:02 PM
TMBLOW TMBLOW is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lots of nerd rage in this thread. Sirken OK'd exactly what we did in Kael. Get over what happened and start thinking of ways to work with us on fixing it going forward, as many of us have said in the last 2 days.
Spin spin spin! This is also false. Sirken "OKd" the Aftermath first attempts on the basis on his encounter logs showing your guild with FTE.

He was not aware Gimpster violated the race rules by starting early before any mobs were spawned nor is he aware that Gimpster waited near the spawn point to FTE in a similar fashion as any face tracker being near a spawn and acquiring an engage.

Yes Sirken OKd the attempts but he was not given a clear full picture what happened. Not only did Aftermath cheat to acquire FTE but they abused the spirit of the new rules stalling the encounter keeping their FTE claim while not in zone.

Seems legit to me - Sirken is now being made aware of the situation to what lead to the FTEs and it would behoove you guys to consider sitting out some Kael mobs if you feel sharing and equal chance at mobs are important aspects to your raiding community
  #202  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:11 PM
FatMice FatMice is offline
Fire Giant

FatMice's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMBLOW [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Spin spin spin! This is also false. Sirken "OKd" the Aftermath first attempts on the basis on his encounter logs showing your guild with FTE.

He was not aware Gimpster violated the race rules by starting early before any mobs were spawned nor is he aware that Gimpster waited near the spawn point to FTE in a similar fashion as any face tracker being near a spawn and acquiring an engage.

Yes Sirken OKd the attempts but he was not given a clear full picture what happened. Not only did Aftermath cheat to acquire FTE but they abused the spirit of the new rules stalling the encounter keeping their FTE claim while not in zone.

Seems legit to me - Sirken is now being made aware of the situation to what lead to the FTEs and it would behoove you guys to consider sitting out some Kael mobs if you feel sharing and equal chance at mobs are important aspects to your raiding community
Tell me exactly how you know this as fact. I really want to know. Otherwise you have absolutely no merit.
__________________
G Meters d'Funk <Good Guys>
---
B Zoole <Indignation/Forsaken/Aftermath> (retired)
  #203  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:15 PM
TMBLOW TMBLOW is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 4
Default

I have no merit to my claim that Sirken made an uninformed ruling?

are you stupid?
  #204  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:22 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMBLOW [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
are you stupid?
That's self-evident at this point. Or are you asking rhetorically?
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #205  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:29 PM
FatMice FatMice is offline
Fire Giant

FatMice's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 648
Default

I am of the mindset that Sirken only rules on yellow text and his rule set. A vague rule set means inconsistent rulings. I think everyone can agree this has and continues to happen. Everything outside of that, as you mentioned ie. not having the full picture is here-say because he never has the full picture and frankly he probably doesn't want to have to hear every angle to even get the full picture. There are too many opinions. That the fucking glorious point of making a stronger, tighter rule set.
__________________
G Meters d'Funk <Good Guys>
---
B Zoole <Indignation/Forsaken/Aftermath> (retired)
  #206  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:33 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We don't need anymore rules. Staff just needs to start deleting characters for lack of common sense.

If you engage a target and do not attempt to start disposing of it immediately, your character should be deleted. Having one or more people weather an assault for an hot does not count as attempting to eliminate the target.
QFT

Like I said ... if you want to stop the drama on this server, simplify the rules and start laying down the law hardcore.

Make CoTH/ducking illegal for FTE purposes.

Any FTE that doesn't result in a direct engage by a capable and ready raid force illegal.


Guild breaks a rule? 30 day ban off ALL raid targets.

No more pansy 5-7 or 10 day slaps on the wrist. Break a major rule and you're out for a fucking month.

Violation involving raid targets while banned from raid targets? Permanently ban the accounts of any character involved.


What do you want to bet that if those rules were put in place all the shenaningans would stop immediately?

The quest for pixels via dubious means would result in loss of all pixels ... all neckbeards would stop playing pussyfoot with the rules.

I'd wager 1 guild would eat the banhammer and everyone would magically learn to get along. If they didn't get along, they'd be banned.

Content would open up, and the game would thrive for the rest of the server.

Too much bullshit goes on at the high end. Raid scene on blue is incredibly toxic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #207  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:38 PM
FatMice FatMice is offline
Fire Giant

FatMice's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Raid scene on blue is incredibly toxic.
I think it is better than ever.
__________________
G Meters d'Funk <Good Guys>
---
B Zoole <Indignation/Forsaken/Aftermath> (retired)
  #208  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:50 PM
Kileras Kileras is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatMice [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think it is better than ever.
i think about 6 of 8 remotely invested raiding guilds are about done with it at this point. I am well aware that it is hard for anyone else to understand where the big A's are coming from when they discuss desires/intent/the scene they want... but if 3/4 of the people participating think things are pretty horrendous I don't think the notion of "play it our way or find a different box" really hold up.
__________________
Fugues - 60 bard <Anonymous>
<ANONYMOUS>
  #209  
Old 04-07-2016, 01:59 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sirken OK'd exactly what we did in Kael. Get over what happened and start thinking of ways to work with us on fixing it going forward, as many of us have said in the last 2 days.
Your guild leader, Detoxx, stating how long the FTE should be available:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If we get FTE, I think an hour is reasonable. If you are leaving the mob up longer than that, its safe to assume youre doing it just to break the spirit of the rule.

Considering you need 30 to kill statue, there is no reason to leave him up more than an hour.
How long was Statue and KT up after Aftermath's FTE's?

Also, Sirken defines a stall:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Q12: What exactly does the Staff consider a stall?
A: As far as engage stalls, the Staff will grant you one DA, or about that much time on an engage before considering it a stall. So it’s important that guilds do not engage a mob until they are ready to kill it. The spirit of the rule (and what we are looking to do here) is to prevent guilds from locking up a target before they are ready to kill it, just to prevent other guilds that are ready to kill it first/faster. If you stall, you need to drop aggro immediately and concede/forfeit the mob. Any number of players can be considered to be stalling a mob, what we look for is the engage of the kill force. I know some of you want an exact number of seconds, or players, or DPS done, but the fact is that’s just not realistic with guilds being so vastly different in numbers and strength while also competing for the same content. The most important thing here is the statement about the spirit of this rule stated above.
And Sirken defines how you drop a valid FTE:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Q10: What about a raid mob being indefinitely kited, stalled, or occupied?
A: It is against server policy to indefinitely kite, stall, or otherwise keep occupied, a raid mob without intention of killing it. You either bring it to your raid, die, or zone out. Obvious stalling of a raid mob, especially in situations to prevent engagement by another guild/party, is against the rules. Ignorance is not an excuse to break this rule, if you are pulling raid targets, we expect you to know what you’re doing.
According to Sirken's own raid rules, Aftermath lost their FTE when they zoned out per rule 10, and Aftermath commited a raid infraction punishable by 10 day full suspension for stalling per the updated rule 12 by engaging a mob before they were ready to kill it.

Sirken is a moron for the way he enforced the FTE, it goes against the "spirit of the rules" he claims are so important to the rules he's laid out. He has ruined any credit for his own rules with the way he enforced it in Kael.
  #210  
Old 04-07-2016, 02:01 PM
Sodors Finest Poster Sodors Finest Poster is offline
Kobold

Sodors Finest Poster's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 175
Default

You'll be more content when some time from now members/leaders of the top two guilds lose their employment and their families over the Velious pixel sickness.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.