![]() |
|
#101
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#102
|
|||
|
You sure have some strong fucking opinions about a system you're not included nor ever will be included in.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#104
|
|||
|
I participated in Taken's loot system for a while, I can confirm it was awful. Too much inflation, and people padding their dkp by pretending to track, but I've yet to see a decent loot system on P99, and probably never will since there is so much greed here.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#105
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#106
|
||||
|
Quote:
The adjustments only apply to active players. Which means, the newer player with low dkp is currently doing approx. as much as the high dkp veteran. And, one never loses one's ranking. But look, if you are not going to try to understand the system I laid out, well, this is a waste of my time. I think you are just trying to protect a system that ensures senior members always will have a huge dkp lead. An adjustment system does not allow that kind of cushy setup.
__________________
go go go
| |||
|
Last edited by Sadre Spinegnawer; 06-03-2016 at 12:13 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#107
|
||||
|
Quote:
But I never was in a blind bidding guild. I was always in /gu open competitive bidding. trust me, it was a hoot. Especially on weekend nights (ie, drunken raiders) you could sometimes goad people to get into bidding wars. It was.... fun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] edit: you can take a look at my 2004 magelo to see what I managed to get under such a system. Got my guild's second talisman of vah kerrath for example. http://eq.magelo.com/profile/482891 If you know loot timleines, you know that no way could i get that gear by 2004 w/o playing hardcore. But the adjustment/freezing system still allowed me to get what i wanted. It required me to keep on my toes and fuckin raid, however. The AG persons complaining want a system where you can go casual and still be top dog. As I said, no idea why any new member would tolerate such a system. Awakened sounds more equitable.
__________________
go go go
| |||
|
Last edited by Sadre Spinegnawer; 06-03-2016 at 12:30 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#108
|
||||
|
Quote:
"The adjustment involved decreasing the points of people at the top and increasing the points of (active) players at the bottom, to get a smaller spread of points." So both of us join a guild at the same time, I get 1000 dkp, you get 100, the average of that period for everyone is 500, so one guy loses some and the other guy gains some so they are both closer to 500? Set me straight, because that sounds like a straight up con
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#109
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#110
|
|||
|
you still are not understanding the system, Expediency. "active raiders" does not = twice a week show ups. Try to add up what I said. You are an officer, I am hoping you can read. Either that, or you are just simply fronting to protect a cushy system for casual veterans.
__________________
go go go
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|