@Menden

[El Camacho]

Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

IT'S TRUE SOME TIMES I ENJOY WRITING HUMOROUS STORIES FOR PEOPLE

"7 years"

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,026


Just sometimes?




Give it to you on humorous though. Good stuff.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Trollkarlen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your argument is very logical but the stated rules have nothing to do with the issue. If any other guild than Apex so blatantly and regularly violated the rules against zone dispruptions by swarming in CoM they would be suspended. At the same time, if Apex raptured another guild's bard in CoM they would not be suspended. This is all about Apex and the corrupt management. All rules are enforced if they benefit Apex. No rules are enforced if they don't. You can safely assume that the same Apex bards will continue to swarm every day in CoM with no interference even though the zone is clearly disrupted. Just don't try to do so yourself if you are in another guild. The GMs are laughing at you.

I just stated how I think it should work. Whether or not there is favoritism is another issue and really isn't up to debate. Either it is corrupt or it isn't.

[El Camacho]

Originally Posted by Servant [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On the one hand, it is dumb that a huge train is essentially equal to pvp immunity for a bard, but on the other hand - if you root them or you rapture them or do anything else that will allow their train to catch up to them, it is TOTALLY CERTAIN that they will take an exp death. The likelihood of you as the pvper actually getting the kill shot in against a com swarm is vanishing-to-none. It's very disingenuous to claim that all you wanted to do was pvp - all you guys posting here about how unfair this is, you're smirking out of the other side of your mouth. Not one of you cast that root or that rapture actually thinking "yeah I'm going to get a YT out of this" - every last one of you KNOWS you are exp-deathing someone, and that's why the rule is right even if it's sad that it has to be that way.

On the other other hand, the bard choose to create a situation where the only possible outcome is to die instantly to the massive train they intentionally created should any possible thing go wrong.

At some point the responsibilty for the outcome of a situation falls on the person that created the situation and not someone else.

[MavstabYoudead]

maybe you got suspended for your blatant train in ToV. Maybe it was for the several other training incidents you were involved in? News flash: don't be an asshat and you don't get banned.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

maybe you got suspended for your blatant train in ToV. Maybe it was for the several other training incidents you were involved in? News flash: don't be an asshat and you don't get banned.

Already confirmed GM said it was for the rapture, please delete this post from the thread moderators. It is misleading.

[MavstabYoudead]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Already confirmed GM said it was for the rapture, please delete this post from the thread moderators. It is misleading.

prof it. scumbag had it coming.

[Trollkarlen]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

prof it. scumbag had it coming.

Mavstab could very well be the lowest iq nerd on the server. Grown up people trying to have a serious dicussion about server policy and all he can muster is rabid subjective yelling about how "his" side is always right. A child in mind and spirit.

[Ignight]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Already confirmed GM said it was for the rapture, please delete this post from the thread moderators. It is misleading.

So if it was just Rapture we can say if Root was used, he would not have been banned? Or attacked in any other way rather than Rapture, is that acceptable? Does this extend to other players that are engaged with NPC's?

Just trying not to get banned here.

[Trollkarlen]

Originally Posted by Ignight [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So if it was just Rapture we can say if Root was used, he would not have been banned? Or attacked in any other way rather than Rapture, is that acceptable? Does this extend to other players that are engaged with NPC's?

Just trying not to get banned here.

To be safe, just run or plug if you are attacked by players with Apex tags. Don't try to make sense of the rules because the problem is entirely with the corrupt enforcement.

[Ignight]

Is there any chance we could get Menden to clarify is thinking around this ruling?