I N D I C T E D

[DMN]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

At the moment just days before the election that James Comey violated FBI policy and announced that Hillary's investigation had been reopened, he was also aware that the Trump campaign was the subject of a counterintelligence investigation. If Hillary was the preferred candidate, why didn't Comey break protocol and announce just before the election that BOTH candidates were under investigation, as he was aware?

Because the FBI had already made a "finding of fact" and that she wasn't going to be tried for her blatant violations of the law. The whole thing was a CYA moment anyway, with the deep state waking up to the reality off a Trump presidency, and shitty their collective pants.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because the FBI had already made a "finding of fact" and that she wasn't going to be tried for her blatant violations of the law.

what law, mr authoriatively speaking on law?

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Russia interfered in the 2016 US Presidential election

They've interfered in every election since forever. Obama was the one who offered the closest thing to a quid pro quo for russia to keep him in office when he told putin he "would have more flexibility when he wins reelection". Remember that, dumb ass? Where was your concern then?

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what law, mr authoriatively speaking on law?

Comey said himself if it was jane doe instead of hillary clinton she would have been prosecuted.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why?

Ideological people don’t create progress except by accident or coincidence. Pragmatism is the way to go (that’s how dad did it)

last post of a great page

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They've interfered in every election since forever. Obama was the one who offered the closest thing to a quid pro quo for russia to keep him in office when he told putin he "would have more flexibility when he wins reelection". Remember that, dumb ass? Where was your concern then?

I'm just glad you can lick your own asshole to make up bullshit because your uniparty candidate won

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Comey said himself if it was jane doe instead of hillary clinton she would have been prosecuted.

no he didn't. she violated state department procedure, not federal law.

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no he didn't. she violated state department procedure, not federal law.

This is a federal statute, dumb ass. She also violated NUMEROUS state department policies, but this was th e crime she committed.


(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed,

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a federal statute, dumb ass. She also violated NUMEROUS state department policies, but this was th e crime she committed.


(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed,

she's the classifying authority in that example, as head of the department of state. she cannot commit a classification offense unless she, or some higher body, i.e. her boss, i.e. obama at the time, says so.

perhaps google the magna cart and learn about sovereignty, my good bitch

[AenorVZ]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you asserting that comey is a traitor too, or that Hillary wasn’t the preferred candidate of the intelligence community?

I'm asserting that Comey was aware that both candidates were under investigation and yet he broke with protocol to make this public as it related only to one of the candidates. These are facts that are in the public sphere. I base my worldview on facts, not intuition. Still waiting for you to tell us what you know that the IC doesn't know. Trusting your gut like Trump?