2020 Post Election MEGAthread

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're not helping anything. Show the evidence. Show the "oh we cant show you" 40 court cases thrown out already. Dont you get it? They can legally LIE to you. They cant to a judge. Why do you think they dont report anything to a judge, like evidence?? Instead they have a "hearing" without anyone under oath LOLOL

You do realize you're talking to an individual outside of the privy of information, don't you.

It's not like the "evidence" your demanding is just waiting for a pleb to crack the davinci code of the Google search engine and input the correct word combo, and viola, proof.

It's a such a fucking stupid proposition.

If "I" had the "proof" you're demanding, I'd already be Hillary'd with 2 to the back of the head

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do realize you're talking to an individual outside of the privy of information, don't you.

It's not like the "evidence" your demanding is just waiting for a pleb to crack the davinci code of the Google search engine and input the correct word combo, and viola, proof.

It's a such a fucking stupid proposition.

If "I" had the "proof" you're demanding, I'd already be Hillary'd with 2 to the back of the head

Ohhhhh I see so now we’re going with the angle of “yeah there was definitely fraud but I/we can’t show you any evidence because they’re burying it and anyone who tries to expose it is immediately deep sixed...but yeah just totally trust us that there was fraud and it’s not just someone who is a pussy and a sore loser over losing the election!!!”

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do realize you're talking to an individual outside of the privy of information, don't you.

It's not like the "evidence" your demanding is just waiting for a pleb to crack the davinci code of the Google search engine and input the correct word combo, and viola, proof.

It's a such a fucking stupid proposition.

If "I" had the "proof" you're demanding, I'd already be Hillary'd with 2 to the back of the head

So you don't have any evidence or proof, gotcha.

So then how do you explain why you believe what you believe? Because Fox News told you Dems bad?

[Lune]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good job Trump and Republican simpletons. Does that look v-shaped to you? Doesn't look v-shaped to me.

[FatherSioux]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good job Trump and Republican simpletons. Does that look v-shaped to you? Doesn't look v-shaped to me.

Maybe you don't know what V-Shaped means, it doesn't mean exactly a V. I would call that V-Shaped.

[FatherSioux]

Originally Posted by imperiouskitten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

may your women meet your dreams first-hand should they come to pass.

you are not a conservative, you are a shallow and aimless radical. With an unhappy heart. This post is all that is needed to diagnose.

Thanks for the diagnoses Doc!

[Caroll]

Donald J. Trump lost the popular vote in both the 2016 and 2020 elections. Donald J. Trump lost the 2020 presidential election to Joseph R. Biden as certified by multiple Republican governors and state-legislators.

When someone loses at a competition that makes them a loser. Sorry to those of you who support losers, it must feel bad to know you're also a loser. Replies will not be read, because you're mad and I won the argument.

[Cassawary]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks for the diagnoses Doc!

The idea that fascism is a form of macho conservatism has damaged the minds of a generation.

[Raev]

Since Lune did call me out, I thought I would post that I think there is pretty good statistical evidence for election fraud. The simplest argument is that Biden's election data totally fail the Benford's Law test. The discrepancy is so bad that Google now has Reuters 'fact check' as the first result for searches!

The fact check is itself a gigantic rhetorical fallacy. First they quote "experts" assuring everyone that Benford's Law doesn't always work without any sort of logical reasoning, a classic appeal to authority. Then they spend half their time laughing at some random guy that got it wrong - a classic strawman argument. Finally, they claim that 'because all Milwaukee wards have about 800 people, that Biden should get around half and thus have lots of numbers that begin with 4/5". A cursory glance at actual results shows that this is false. The only superficially serious objection that I could find is from 2017, and while I only skimmed it I believe it to be deliberately deceptive as their 'proof' is based on simulations and they only test the 2nd digit, which is much weaker, on actual cases.

If you don't like that, you can try this ZeroHedge article about the mail in ballots. The short version is that in contrast to the sharp differences in vote share between counties, all mail in dumps should have the same percentage of Biden/Trump because the Post Office effectively shuffles the mail in ballots. Instead, in key battleground states that percentage snuck up overnight.

Any election fraud was almost certainly accomplished via Dominion's electronic voting machines. Sidney Powell's lawsuit includes an affidavit by a well respected cyber security expert with an annoying compound name that I can't remember right now where he basically says that a) these machines were designed to commit fraud, and do not even have an audit log b) the entire company has substantial ties to China in multiple ways.

Finally, I consider election fraud to be the default rather than exception, so this is hardly surprising (Remember Stalin? "It's not who votes that counts, but who counts the votes!") It's ridiculous that the Fake news spent multiple years frothing at the mouth about Russian interference in 2016 but now that we have actual video of people in Georgia counting after hours we are supposed to assume that a guy who never left his basement or had a rally with more than 10 people won by 10 million votes.

Regardless, I don't really consider election fraud all that important. The real issue is whether the American people will allow themselves to live in an Agenda 2030 totalitarian dictatorship because they are afraid of a virus with a 99.5% survival rate for people under age 70. Corona Circus has the best election analysis IMO and I think Trump will likely repeat as president, simply because the Right has the guns and needs to think they are in control.

This post was fact checked as TRUE by independent researchers

[Caroll]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since Lune did call me out, I thought I would post that I think there is pretty good statistical evidence for election fraud. The simplest argument is that Biden's election data totally fail the Benford's Law test. The discrepancy is so bad that Google now has Reuters 'fact check' as the first result for searches!

The fact check is itself a gigantic rhetorical fallacy. First they quote "experts" assuring everyone that Benford's Law doesn't always work without any sort of logical reasoning, a classic appeal to authority. Then they spend half their time laughing at some random guy that got it wrong - a classic strawman argument. Finally, they claim that 'because all Milwaukee wards have about 800 people, that Biden should get around half and thus have lots of numbers that begin with 4/5". A cursory glance at actual results shows that this is false. The only superficially serious objection that I could find is from 2017, and while I only skimmed it I believe it to be deliberately deceptive as their 'proof' is based on simulations and they only test the 2nd digit, which is much weaker, on actual cases.

If you don't like that, you can try this ZeroHedge article about the mail in ballots. The short version is that in contrast to the sharp differences in vote share between counties, all mail in dumps should have the same percentage of Biden/Trump because the Post Office effectively shuffles the mail in ballots. Instead, in key battleground states that percentage snuck up overnight.

Any election fraud was almost certainly accomplished via Dominion's electronic voting machines. Sidney Powell's lawsuit includes an affidavit by a well respected cyber security expert with an annoying compound name that I can't remember right now where he basically says that a) these machines were designed to commit fraud, and do not even have an audit log b) the entire company has substantial ties to China in multiple ways.

Finally, I consider election fraud to be the default rather than exception, so this is hardly surprising (Remember Stalin? "It's not who votes that counts, but who counts the votes!") It's ridiculous that the Fake news spent multiple years frothing at the mouth about Russian interference in 2016 but now that we have actual video of people in Georgia counting after hours we are supposed to assume that a guy who never left his basement or had a rally with more than 10 people won by 10 million votes.

Regardless, I don't really consider election fraud all that important. The real issue is whether the American people will allow themselves to live in an Agenda 2030 totalitarian dictatorship because they are afraid of a virus with a 99.5% survival rate for people under age 70.

This post was fact checked as TRUE by independent researchers

Trump-appointed, Federalist Society appellate, district, and state Supreme Court judges along with the Attorney General found no credible evidence of fraud.

Your YouTube video isn't proof. Facts don't care about your opinions. Better luck next time.