Lest We Forget the 'Victims'

[wuanahto]

I am existing in a current event and I feel hype and now I want more.

Is there another trial coming up for anyone or anything else?

[bubur]

Originally Posted by wuanahto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am existing in a current event and I feel hype and now I want more.

Is there another trial coming up for anyone or anything else?

maxwell trial has begun jury selection

[wuanahto]

Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

maxwell trial has begun jury selection

I dont know what that is but I want blood and tons of posts surrounded by all types of communities across all forms of internet services.

[bubur]

cool and normal

u mite just get it

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

maxwell trial has begun jury selection

We should get both the Charlottesville(Nazis) civil verdict and the Ahmaud Arbery criminal verdict before that really starts up.

[hobart]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hobart might find it within himself to condemn the rioters some day.

Um, I see the disconnect here. What part of "pieces of shit" did you think was an endorsement?

Normal people don't want miscreants and looters in the streets -and- also don't want radicalized ideologues trying to set up scenarios where they're justified killing said miscreants.

But you'll rationalize anything because if the looters are the bad guys, your fellow Trumptard who shot them must be a good guy.

[bubur]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We should get both the Charlottesville(Nazis) civil verdict and the Ahmaud Arbery criminal verdict before that really starts up.

ya im hopeful these cases go the right way. but pretty much unrelated: i also hope ghislaine maxwell gets what she deserves. my opinion of that is public death sentence, but we'll see what the trial says ya know.. depends a lot on the discovery of the case when it comes down to it

[Castle2.0]

your fellow Trumptard who shot them must be a good guy.

He was only 17, so legally he couldn't even vote R. As the law states, under 17 and over 117 votes are exclusively D.

[Convict]

Originally Posted by hobart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Um, I see the disconnect here. What part of "pieces of shit" did you think was an endorsement?

Normal people don't want miscreants and looters in the streets -and- also don't want radicalized ideologues trying to set up scenarios where they're justified killing said miscreants.

But you'll rationalize anything because if the looters are the bad guys, your fellow Trumptard who shot them must be a good guy.

Yeah Im sure the 17 year old kid was a radicalized idealogue "trumptard" who purposefully set up a scenario where people rushed after him trying to harm and/or kill him just so he could shoot them. That narrative sounds totally grounded in reality. What a poor misguided trumptard he is.

[bubur]

he was 17, only i can tell you what a 17 year feels
fucker