Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:11 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

FYI, training is the hardest of any PnP to actually prove or come to a conclusion about as a GM.

You have to derive intent, which is fucking impossible. If they were bringing in the mobs cause PvP was required before someone engaged or killed the mob, or just trained...

Deriving intent is not possible. Your asking for shit. These issues have been discussed at fucking length a dozen goddamned times.

GMs on R99 should have 1 fuking purpose, to handle mechanics and things of the such. Getting them involved in any PK'ing activities will kill your server. GMs get involved, make decisions, people question it, then people leave, then there is no PvP, then more ppl leave, then server dead.
  #22  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:14 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

In all frankness and seriousness...

Just keep the GMs the fuck off R99.

The only dev / GM that has even been wanted in the PvP forums has been you (Rogean).

Just keep the GMs off R99. Get a couple to do char stuck, corpse under world, zones down, etc... game mechanics.

Sorry to respond with less than ample patience, but I have been preaching this for 3 or 4 years...
  #23  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:18 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In all frankness and seriousness...

Just keep the GMs the fuck off R99.

The only dev / GM that has even been wanted in the PvP forums has been you (Rogean).

Just keep the GMs off R99. Get a couple to do char stuck, corpse under world, zones down, etc... game mechanics.

Sorry to respond with less than ample patience, but I have been preaching this for 3 or 4 years...
What about rules that are easy to enforce (like bind camping)? The deterrent value of being punished for something like that is enough to make most people not do it. It's not going to burn out the GM staff since virtually no one would be dumb enough to risk doing it.

Yeah training isn't easy to catch, but that's just a reason for needing a high standard of evidence before punishing anyone. If there's not enough evidence, then just don't get involved. And most blatant training should be solved by casting root anyway. I fail to see how this is a big deal. If you don't have a rule against training there will be about a hundred times more of it.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #24  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:28 PM
pasi pasi is offline
Planar Protector

pasi's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FYI, training is the hardest of any PnP to actually prove or come to a conclusion about as a GM.

You have to derive intent, which is fucking impossible. If they were bringing in the mobs cause PvP was required before someone engaged or killed the mob, or just trained...

Deriving intent is not possible. Your asking for shit. These issues have been discussed at fucking length a dozen goddamned times.

GMs on R99 should have 1 fuking purpose, to handle mechanics and things of the such. Getting them involved in any PK'ing activities will kill your server. GMs get involved, make decisions, people question it, then people leave, then there is no PvP, then more ppl leave, then server dead.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg war_on_drugs2.jpg (67.8 KB, 120 views)
  #25  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:31 PM
Rushmore Rushmore is offline
Planar Protector

Rushmore's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,262
Default

If you allow someone to bind camp you're an idiot.

Training shouldn't be allowed but if you get caught by GM or Fraps your character is deleted.
Why do GMs in the past continue to suspend a player!?!? It does nothing.

1) First Time Offender ....Delete Character
2) Second Time Offender ....Delete Character and Bind IP.

If you allow training more people will roll monks, Sk, Necro just to take advantage and the population will go down.
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD
"I will honor those who honor Me, but those who despise Me will be disgraced." HCSB 1 Samuel 2:30
Last edited by Rushmore; 08-21-2011 at 09:35 PM..
  #26  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:43 PM
Amuk Amuk is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 821
Default

Pro's and cons for both - if you have staff willing to enforce it No Training policy is more fun. But if there isn't the support and the GM's arn't up for that commitment I wouldn't blame them.
  #27  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:45 PM
georgie georgie is offline
Planar Protector

georgie's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,528
Default

training should be allowed to an extent. it shouldn't be allowed in raid zones.
ex: CT enraged 3%
monk:/fd
guild:/dead

-also think it should be that long wait for enemies to forget you. like in p99.
  #28  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:53 PM
Doors Doors is offline
Planar Protector

Doors's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,933
Default

Bind camping should be legal but only if theres no exp on death from other players. Coin loot but no item loot. No training because its stupid and overshadows any actual PVP.

People who intentionally train should get like 1 week bans or something. Permanent ban seems like a bit much.

As far as cheating goes, should be a three strikes rule. Third strike = perm ban. Just instantly banning people you catch for a first offense will kill server population fast. Not that I'm sticking up for these scrubs that do use MQ and shit but perm ban right on first offense seems harsh also.

and Harrison shut the fuck up. This isn't World of Warcraft.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakaris View Post
You can be my squire once you can bench half of what I can.
  #29  
Old 08-21-2011, 09:56 PM
Doors Doors is offline
Planar Protector

Doors's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,933
Default

LnS might be necessary but not right off the bat of server start. Honestly I want to play on a pretty brutal PVP server and no LnS makes it all the better. Also LnS is really hard, annoying and tedious to police as a GM.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakaris View Post
You can be my squire once you can bench half of what I can.
  #30  
Old 08-21-2011, 10:01 PM
Rushmore Rushmore is offline
Planar Protector

Rushmore's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,262
Default

banning does nothing. Why doesn't anyone ever call for character delete?
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD
"I will honor those who honor Me, but those who despise Me will be disgraced." HCSB 1 Samuel 2:30
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.