![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
It's barely worth discussing in detail because the occurrences of this stuff happening are going to be few and far in between.
The "level 35 guy fights at level 50" in Lower Guk is a very specific scenario and it doesn't really fucking matter anyway. If you're in Lower Guk in the first place, you should be okay to fight anyone else in there. It's not a 1-50 zone. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#32
|
|||
|
Having played on RZ myself, I'd really prefer a +/- 4 LvL Scenario. 8 lvls in EQ make such a huge difference, plus when its FFA the +/- 8 doesn't make much sense to me. Can go into details if you want [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Hallyguk Zek <Europa> Officer and Ogre Oracle
Spirit luvin' and Slayer of the Sleeper Kerafyrm. Formerly known as: Hallyguk Knochenbrecker Level 65 Shaman of Wudan on Rallos Zek | ||
|
|
|||
|
#33
|
|||
|
i'd say exp loss, and maybe YT, should only occur if you're +/- 4 levels, but that you should still be pvp-able +/- 8.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#34
|
|||
|
Yellow text and server OOC need to be removed.
As far as getting flagged for a lvl ranged based on attacking NPCs... thats kinda fuk'd. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||
|
8 lvl difference sounds about right...But you should give the lower player a option to take flag off if he feels cocky enough to attack the higher lvl.YOu would be amazed what 10 lower can do to higher lvl..
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#38
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yt does not need removed. You'll get over the shame of being broadcasted within a few minutes, I promise it won't ruin your life. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#39
|
|||
|
+/- 8 levels i a good spread. It helps minimize people just out of range training an entire raid force. Asshattery will always happen but lets keep things civil
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#40
|
|||
|
+/- 8 is a fair range, but certain high end zones should just be FFA. Level 1 rogue following you around in perma, sol b, etc or a low lvl enc ivuing through guk to scout will be very annoying without a way to retaliate.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|