Discussion: Play Nice (Training, Bind Camping) - Page 31

Billbike · #**301** 10-12-2011, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What a fail analogy.

Training will happen everyday. If training is policed, GMs will be overwhelmed with QQ allday everyday. People will be falsely accused and punished. GMs will be accused of favoritism. It will be a huge waste of resources, like what I said in my analogy.

Rust1d? · #**302** 10-12-2011, 09:00 AM

Train complaints should be limited to one moron or a few morons training the same people over and over again. An example would be sojourner on K&B. He would just train all day. Same with Darksinga, he would /who all fear, come in and just train.

Lovely · #**303** 10-12-2011, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Training will happen everyday. If training is policed, GMs will be overwhelmed with QQ allday everyday. People will be falsely accused and punished. GMs will be accused of favoritism. It will be a huge waste of resources, like what I said in my analogy.

That's exactly what happened to me on blue99, falsely accused and suspended. But thank god that fucking piece of shit GM is gone now. I assume you can guess who it is. In that situation it was 100% favoritism and power abuse.

Therefor I'm all for training being allowed. It would just save everyone a huge hassle especially the GM's.

Envious · #**304** 10-12-2011, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What a fail analogy.

Heard your guild got griefed off the server...

http://youtu.be/_6wzsIh93qc

Lethdar, the guy that doesnt want trains... cause he could never camp pixels. The guy that doesnt want pumice, so he can camp Golem wands.

U sound blue homie. I got a 54 warrior on P99 and can prolly get you into TMO if you wanna do it up.

Dontmez_Mebro · #**305** 10-12-2011, 03:32 PM

Trains were always a part of EQ. I think it will be easier on the GM's if they just allow it. If some jerk gets known for training then corpse/bind camp him back into childhood.

gloinz · #**306** 10-12-2011, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dontmez_Mebro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trains were always a part of EQ. I think it will be easier on the GM's if they just allow it. If some jerk gets known for training then corpse/bind camp him back into childhood.

amen

Softcore PK · #**307** 10-12-2011, 03:39 PM

When training was allowed (SZ) it did not result in people banding together to grief them, it resulted in EVERYONE training.

lame imo.

Lazortag · #**308** 10-12-2011, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Softcore PK [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When SZ was allowed (SZ) it did not result in people banding together to grief them, it resulted in EVERYONE training.

lame imo.

Agreed. You can't have the community police training because there isn't a clear agreement on whether training is even a bad thing. Moreover, players aren't as qualified to spot training when it occurs as GM's are, so it would either result in the community not punishing training aggressively enough, or punishing people who didn't actually train. And if training was allowed pretty much everyone would do it because of how potent of a strategy it is, so the community couldn't police it because everyone would be doing it. As fun as training is, you can't justify allowing it.

Sarkov · #**309** 10-13-2011, 01:24 PM

Play nice policy is stupid on a pvp server.

Glad I'm not on the GM staff, if they want to try and enforce a no-train rule. Good luck with that one.

Null · #**310** 10-21-2011, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarkov [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Play nice policy is stupid on a pvp server.

Glad I'm not on the GM staff, if they want to try and enforce a no-train rule. Good luck with that one.

Its mostly automated so yea.