Resist Feedback post 11/6/2011

[Tombom]

Originally Posted by Melveny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm going to roll a pally on launch

I am ok with it being that none of my stuns land, sucks. I hate the idea of having spells I can never use, but im not playing a paladin for that reason anyway.

I do like the idea of reducing the duration of the stun based off resists, and gives clerics / pallys / enchanters a little more viability, or we can all just play a ogre sk like 35% of the population will be.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Sprinkle]

35% SK 35% Druid rest magician/nec

[Vile]

Originally Posted by Melveny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm going to roll a pally on launch

I am ok with it being that none of my stuns land, sucks. I hate the idea of having spells I can never use, but im not playing a paladin for that reason anyway.

I do like the idea of reducing the duration of the stun based off resists, and gives clerics / pallys / enchanters a little more viability, or we can all just play a ogre sk like 35% of the population will be.

I am rolling a gnome rogue, fuck all yall spellz.

[DarthPeon]

Originally Posted by Tamiah2011 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hate you for what not knowing what the hell your talking about?Maybe you can tell me the first head GM name in classic EQ 1999 , pretty common knowlege for a classic player to know?

His name was Jeff Butler, what's your point? You failed to comprehend the issues people have brought up and that's why you are a troll responding with gibberish. Just about everyone who has commented on you is in agreement.

Stuns should be brought up in line with root/snare. Otherwise pally/cleric rape trains to glory.

Not that it matters - but check out Louis (50 cleric) currently soloing everyone nightly in ec.

[Tombom]

Louis down to tombom and crew last night, heard it here first

[Nuk3Afr1ca]

If stuns are gonna be on server, they should have a minimum duration of 1 second and use the following resists:

Resist Duration
------ -------
25MR 100%
50MR 75%
75MR 62.5%
100MR 50%
125MR 37.5%
150MR 25%
175MR 12.5%
200MR defaults to 1 second

[Null]

Originally Posted by Nuk3Afr1ca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If stuns are gonna be on server, they should have a minimum duration of 1 second and use the following resists:

Resist Duration
------ -------
25MR 100%
50MR 75%
75MR 62.5%
100MR 50%
125MR 37.5%
150MR 25%
175MR 12.5%
200MR defaults to 1 second

So against targets with 200MR+ it becomes more efficient to use lower level stuns because you get zero benefit from a higher level spells duration?

[Tombom]

I don't think duration should be changed, just resist rate. If you lose because it was 1 second vs. 3 you were going to lose anyways.

[Nuk3Afr1ca]

Originally Posted by Null [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So against targets with 200MR+ it becomes more efficient to use lower level stuns because you get zero benefit from a higher level spells duration?

Sure, if you're a level 50 wizard. Then when you ding 51, the new one is probably better for use against all targets. :

Tishan's Discord, Wizard - Level 51

1 : Stun for 5.0* seconds (*some player-cast stuns are capped at 4 seconds)
2 : Decrease Hitpoints by 260
Mana: 130

[Null]

Originally Posted by Nuk3Afr1ca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure, if you're a level 50 wizard. Then when you ding 51, the new one is probably better for use against all targets. :

Tishan's Discord, Wizard - Level 51

1 : Stun for 5.0* seconds (*some player-cast stuns are capped at 4 seconds)
2 : Decrease Hitpoints by 260
Mana: 130

Sure for Wizards, but how about Paladins and Clerics?