Want to actually raid?

[falkun]

Originally Posted by MooseTX82 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BTW im still waiting on proof where I flaunt my guild as if we were not associated with TMO. Or the part where I act as if we are doing things on our own accord without the alliance. Please do post it here if you ever find it.

Originally Posted by Poopy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO's Forum Snip

Originally Posted by MooseTX82 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im pretty sure you have no idea about my guild. We are not an alt guild of anybody. So really if you dont know anything about it why talk shit?

Originally Posted by Zeelot

TMO members that are willing, will join Enraptured for the next two weeks and possibly beyond - on their main or alt.

Originally Posted by MooseTX82 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

2 Alts? Seriously? Whos in the guild besides Darkdeath? Im curious to see what you THINK you know? Get the fuck off my guild's recruitment thread and go to RnF if you want to talk shit. I dont come talk one bit on your guild's thread do I? Show some kinda class and respect.

Originally Posted by Zeelot

though I will be tagged an Enraptured officer, take part in loot council, and speak for the few choice items that our friends need.

Originally Posted by MooseTX82 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

False comments with no proof to back it up. Name 1 person from Enraptured that is in TMO. Oh you can't? That's probably because it has never happened. You have always been so obsessed with this Enraptured TMO alliance. Get over it man.

Nope, people just join Enraptured from TMO to get around a raid ban:

Originally Posted by Alyssa

Will they be racing bda etc? Is this going to upset the staff who suspended us?

I don't care if you partner with TMO, but don't try to sell it to the server like you are not literally a pawn guild for TMO. Even when VD was allied with IB, IB didn't have a member on VD's loot council.

Also, to all you TMO who feel you are being altruistic: You are denying content to anyone not "blessed" by you because you don't like us (for whatever reasons). This is the same thing IB did to TMO. You didn't defeat your enemy, you became that enemy.

Originally Posted by Zeelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To be honest. TMOs entry to the raid scene was not hardcore. I decided to make TMO a hardcore raiding guild right before kunark release. The only reason I decided this was in response to IB's actions at TMOs first ever nagafen attempt.

At this naggy, an IB member named Olympia aggrod naggy and kited for 40 seconds, TMO engaged and killed it with some IB help(8-12 people) and IB was awarded the kill. This was after numerous tells by kinsawt throughout the day that IB would give TMO and uncontested attempt.

There's something wrong when the #1 guild does this to a brand new up and coming guild on the server.

It was at this point in time that I decided the raid scene needs a new #1 guild and that IB needed to go.

When you see the face of evil, old-hat TMO think you see IB/TR; what you really see are yourselves. To new TMO members who hopped on the TMO bandwagon after-the-fact, you are either blind/ignorant to who you have joined, or you actively choose to deny the truth for personal gain.

[Alarti0001]

Well we can't feed everyone at once. Wait your turn!

[falkun]

And for Nietche's misguided benefit:

Originally Posted by Nietche [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BDA/VD will only prove to the server that they can compete when there is no competition. This fact doesn't make them number 1. Their "do good" post on server side is no different from what TMO has tried to do in the past. The only difference is that instead of TMO taking 6 of the main "dragon kills" after server repop is that BDA did it.

They even skipped doling out the droppable loot off CT, Gore, etc. until they took out their last dragon (Trak), so I imagine they were in a hurry to prevent other guilds (presumably Div and Acryid) from taking "their targets." I guess there is a sense of entitlement with BDA after all, which, interestingly enough, goes against their propaganda to the server: "Again, BDA makes no claims of possession over any other raid target."

When TMO was suspended, BDA did give that unconstested shot on the #1 raid target to another guild that Zeelot wished had been offered to his guild:

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We nearly killed Trak (got him to 20%) but had a positioning issue and Trak started climbing up the wall, so DPS stopped. It was still our fault, but if it hadn't happened, we would have won.

What does TMO do when other guilds want an uncontested shot at a new encounter? They train them until their raid suspension is lifted early.

[arsenalpow]

Not to mention any raid target that was considered an open raid had the loot randomed, pretty sure that Div SK was pretty happy after everything was said and done.

[Rais]

Leave me out of your shitfest trolling. I have no idea who Poopy is or why they are trolling me. Most likely more tmo spin since you had to have 2 people exploit to kill a afk monk in vp. I never post shit anon. I may sometimes cringe at some shit I say at some point and say well shit, I wish I never posted that since it makes me look like a dumbshit.



[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Rais]

I don't care if you partner with TMO, but don't try to sell it to the server like you are not literally a pawn guild for TMO. Even when VD was allied with IB, IB didn't have a member on VD's loot council.

Also, to all you TMO who feel you are being altruistic: You are denying content to anyone not "blessed" by you because you don't like us (for whatever reasons). This is the same thing IB did to TMO. You didn't defeat your enemy, you became that enemy.

Not true. They threatened to end the alliance with VD over loot a few encounters. Namely Cleric BP, Shield from Cazic. The former was what made us have a loot order of items/gods. The fact IB treated most from VD like shit, especially on the raid leader level makes me amazed at how a good handful of former officers/leaders decided to join them on EQmac. I guess I could understand. Either stay here and watch TMO get away with everything, or go play another server with people who looked down on your guild and hope to be part of them.

[falkun]

I did not say the IB/VD alliance was 50/50 fair.
I did not say IB did not have a say/bias on loot.

But IB&VD's loot scheme was completed before whatever loot entered VD's hands for VD to distribute amongst its own members. The scheme between TMO & Enraptured is within their own loot council.

[quido]

I don't believe you!

[Jomar]

The best part is the editable Date Taken field in the picture properties (the one right below the editable Author field) says it was taken yesterday afternoon, one minute before it was posted, when clearly it was taken on June 16th at 5:51PM.

Not that screenshots append either of those fields to the image when they're taken anyway.

[quido]

Jomar, Rais posted that screenshot as an example of how easy it is to change that Author field, not in an attempt to convince us that this shows the original contents of that field for that image (of a different name).

I nonetheless maintain my assertion that this was a genuine oversight from a scrub troller and not some ridiculous setup. I think next time you'll remember, bub!