Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:07 PM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

With the eye, were those double attacks every .5, or quads every 1 second? Looks like 155 was the max damage.
__________________
Last edited by Dullah; 01-29-2013 at 07:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:21 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

http://mysite.verizon.net/drexxell/eq/planeofsky.html

says 865 for eye
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:31 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,760
Default

That site is retarded then. I posted logs from Live, every other site says otherwise, why should we believe that site over all the other information?
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:37 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's also a guide from 2006. They have an edit note "Changed Max Hit of Hand of Veeshan to 865 (Credit: Technetium)", but when you scroll down to Hand of Veeshan it says "500". Looks like someone goofed when editing the entry.

This one from a 2002 Archive rip says:
http://web.archive.org/web/200202070....htm#itemsdrop


Quote:
Eye of Veeshan
Number on island: 1
Level: 63
Aggressive: No
Assist: Yes
Hits for: 200
HPs: 32000
Resists: High

Hand of Veeshan
Number on island: 1
Level: 63
Aggressive: Yes (about 1/4th of drake island toward butterfly island)
Assist: Yes
Hits for: 865
HPs: 32000
From another 2001 Archive rip:
http://web.archive.org/web/200110291...r/EQ/skyguide/

Quote:
The eye is a pushover, comparable to the sister.

The hand double for 865, procs a 500 dd, and AEs for 200 - one mean bastard. Both are lure only of course.
Another issue is the Eye of Veeshan's resists. Currently you can nuke with normal nukes from a distance. These guides indicate high resists or lure only.
Last edited by Ele; 01-29-2013 at 07:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:39 PM
Rusl Rusl is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 144
Default

First line of guide
"Initial data collected between Nov 2005 and Jan 2006"
Stopped reading, not classic pals
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:55 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Neither is HB's Live parses

zing.

EQMac ftw on this shit imo.

Much like my ranting for item loot + resist fixes..

Fix Sirran charm + sky bosses at same time. Not trying to dick people over.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-29-2013, 08:30 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,760
Default

Please find me data that shows they ever adjusted the mob dps in sky and you can then comment on the live parses.
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-29-2013, 08:52 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the eye, were those double attacks every .5, or quads every 1 second? Looks like 155 was the max damage.
To me it looks like quads every 1.5 seconds.

P.S. Nirgon, you should just stop before you embarrass yourself any more. Heartbrand did some good research; your only goal is to troll the people who kicked you off R99.

In reality there are far more things in sky that are charm immune that shouldn't be than there are charmable things that shouldn't be (see my long post on plane of sky).
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-29-2013, 09:03 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Never said I knew the exact values for what the Eye should be hitting for, nor will I stop reminding you that both the Keymaster and Sirran were used for a very brief period while the bard charm was bugged.

Addition:
Trakanon's breath is too easy to resist here (big time).
This bee should be doubling, not quadding for 800s.
Time to stop mage sword procs when wielded by pets on non-summoned (something I recall, and thank god there were patch notes otherwise you'd disagree on that too).

No one has ever posted good evidence that Sirran should be charmable by enchanters. The only evidence posted was on par with the quality of that Plane of Sky guide.
If the Eye is hitting for too much? Make it classic, bring it down.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-29-2013, 09:28 PM
Crazyeye Crazyeye is offline
Sarnak

Crazyeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 212
Default

You realize on live this game has had 11 years to do updates from velious to present right ? Logs on live now mean nothing without archived proof... Would prob be better off trying to find evidence on this through the wayback instead of on current live ( 11 years ahead of the expansion / classic state of game were in remember? ).
__________________
Crazyeyes King Of Thieves 60 Rogue
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.