Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #551  
Old 05-10-2013, 06:34 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Relapsee, I'm coming for that ass. Break me off a piece of that ass, beeyotch.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #552  
Old 05-10-2013, 06:48 PM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rellapse11 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
we can go swimming in my newly cleaned pool by Jesus although shit does sink, i will throw you floaties.
Can...can I go swimming?
  #553  
Old 05-10-2013, 06:59 PM
AenarieFenninRo AenarieFenninRo is offline
Aviak

AenarieFenninRo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol, I'm sorry, that last post was severely amusing
I find it amusing as well... I went through and did a quick count of 178 targets that TMO "went after" from 3/10 (inclusive) until now, and I see a 146 TMO vs 32 for other guilds... 82%

Personally, I think it is irrelevant how many a given guild "went after" it is more about how many targets TOTAL have spawned in that time, which I don't know that either guild can confidently claim an exact number, but I would guess it is somewhere around 225 range, and I would rather have 146/225 (64.9%), than 58/225 (25.8%) any day of the week.

Doraf - Just because FE didn't "go after" a target doesn't mean there weren't raid targets to kill, I mean lets be honest here, your numbers probably only list one VP dragon (Druushk on 3/19). You may say "well we didn't go after VP dragons so you cant count those..." which is of course true, you don't go after the dragons, you just go to train us to try to prevent us from killing them.

How is that prevention effort going anyway? Delays may have occurred, but have you really stopped us from killing anything in there?

But, Does FE not going after a mob mean that those raid mobs didn't spawn in your world Doraf? Am I reading your theoretical "we're awesome we killed 54% of the mobs" math correctly? If I missed some major point here for how you're coming up with your theoretical FE is winning propaganda, please let me know.
  #554  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:02 PM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AenarieFenninRo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I find it amusing as well... I went through and did a quick count of 178 targets that TMO "went after" from 3/10 (inclusive) until now, and I see a 146 TMO vs 32 for other guilds... 82%

Personally, I think it is irrelevant how many a given guild "went after" it is more about how many targets TOTAL have spawned in that time, which I don't know that either guild can confidently claim an exact number, but I would guess it is somewhere around 225 range, and I would rather have 146/225 (64.9%), than 58/225 (25.8%) any day of the week.

Doraf - Just because FE didn't "go after" a target doesn't mean there weren't raid targets to kill, I mean lets be honest here, your numbers probably only list one VP dragon (Druushk on 3/19). You may say "well we didn't go after VP dragons so you cant count those..." which is of course true, you don't go after the dragons, you just go to train us to try to prevent us from killing them.

How is that prevention effort going anyway? Delays may have occurred, but have you really stopped us from killing anything in there?

But, Does FE not going after a mob mean that those raid mobs didn't spawn in your world Doraf? Am I reading your theoretical "we're awesome we killed 54% of the mobs" math correctly? If I missed some major point here for how you're coming up with your theoretical FE is winning propaganda, please let me know.
  #555  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:04 PM
AenarieFenninRo AenarieFenninRo is offline
Aviak

AenarieFenninRo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Default

I had to help you make the "Cruise Clapping" signature relevant buddy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #556  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:09 PM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

I have a tomato garden sign me up for a gallon of cow.
  #557  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:10 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

hes saying his guild got more then half the targets they wanted and are happy about it

talk about nerd rage go the fuck outside
  #558  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:14 PM
doraf doraf is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AenarieFenninRo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I find it amusing as well... I went through and did a quick count of 178 targets that TMO "went after" from 3/10 (inclusive) until now, and I see a 146 TMO vs 32 for other guilds... 82%

Personally, I think it is irrelevant how many a given guild "went after" it is more about how many targets TOTAL have spawned in that time, which I don't know that either guild can confidently claim an exact number, but I would guess it is somewhere around 225 range, and I would rather have 146/225 (64.9%), than 58/225 (25.8%) any day of the week.

Doraf - Just because FE didn't "go after" a target doesn't mean there weren't raid targets to kill, I mean lets be honest here, your numbers probably only list one VP dragon (Druushk on 3/19). You may say "well we didn't go after VP dragons so you cant count those..." which is of course true, you don't go after the dragons, you just go to train us to try to prevent us from killing them.

How is that prevention effort going anyway? Delays may have occurred, but have you really stopped us from killing anything in there?

But, Does FE not going after a mob mean that those raid mobs didn't spawn in your world Doraf? Am I reading your theoretical "we're awesome we killed 54% of the mobs" math correctly? If I missed some major point here for how you're coming up with your theoretical FE is winning propaganda, please let me know.
Work your reading comprehension up a little more and then go back and read my post. I said that FE went after 108 targets and scored 53.7% of them. That is not every target that has popped on the server and that number includes logged VP attempts which is the main reason it was as low as 53%.
  #559  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:15 PM
doraf doraf is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
hes saying his guild got more then half the targets they wanted and are happy about it

talk about nerd rage go the fuck outside
LOL, thank you Bazia. Finally somebody who can read. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #560  
Old 05-10-2013, 07:18 PM
AenarieFenninRo AenarieFenninRo is offline
Aviak

AenarieFenninRo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
hes saying his guild got more then half the targets they wanted and are happy about it

talk about nerd rage go the fuck outside
Not quite, what he is saying is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by doraf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Try to spin it either way you want, but you're only killing half the mobs you were last year.
I'm pointing out that his logic is flawed (25.8% != 50% less mobs for TMO), I'm trying to help the poor guy here, and you decide that assisting someone in defining how math works is rage... Relax, Deep Breath, Repeat
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.