Quote:
Originally Posted by Millburn
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Totally agree with you on this Bob. I just think it's important that the discussions we do have to this end be based on the system that we have now, not a system that we want in the future. (By system I mean the mechanics and coding, not a raiding agreement) It's been a couple times now where the GM's have said something to this effect.
|
I see your point but at the same time, and I have said this to some high level negotiators from the T1 raid guilds, they need to have 2 proposals for the GMs.
One in which there are no mechanics changes to the server where the ball is entirely in our court (which will be the worst of the two proposals in my opinion) and a SECOND proposal that includes mechanics changes via the staff. Be this variance changes, re-pops, dildos made of cheese raining from the sky, whatever.
This puts the ball in their court and hopefully they will decide to anty into the pot and help the players make this a better server.