Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Understandable and valid point, but in our case it was all about how the agreement was written. Services were basically pre-paid and no single person or entity had control over the coverage.
Now if a single entity owned it's own PPS and wanted to go warlord style...yah, problems.
|
Even if they were independent, how are the rules set up? do they enforce law or preference? what wiggle room would there be between law and preference for individual communities? It isn't so hard for me to imagine them getting a contract or a raise based on the idea that certain things will slide.. Sounds like conflict of interest and a recipe for corruption to me.