Originally Posted by Eunomia[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am the one that decided the name Colgate didn't need to be changed. ME It was put before me to make sure there was no bias.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrench[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if a staff member who normally doesnt handle name changes had to be expressly asked to handle a certain person, isnt that proof enough that there is an issue?
is it not favoritism to have one gm handle potential name changes, and a different one, who views the threshold differently, be asked to handle any who he might be friends with?