Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-26-2016, 04:11 PM
Lune Lune is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is no control group, ergo you cannot know the cause inductively. We know the earth has gotten warmer over the past 150 years, we just don't know why.
We do know why, you're just denying the evidence because of a scientifically illiterate fixation on a control group.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The other molecules that were placed into the machine that produced a different pattern.
That's not a control group. A control group is when you are performing an experiment, and you have samples/subjects where you do not change the variable, in order to isolate the independent/dependent variables, and causality.

They peeked inside a molecule and observed a helical structure. That's it. It told them nothing about how it got that way, and observing other molecular shapes told them nothing about DNA helices other than not all molecules are helix shaped.

What actually tells us about the cause of the helix is a massive series of experiments and observations (some of which do have control groups) dealing with molecular orbital theory.

Anthropomorphic climate change is also based on a mountain of experimentation and observation that gives us a high confidence (>90%) that humans have contributed to the warming.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So if you agree that the atmosphere is a tremendously complex, chaotic system with many positive and negative feedback loops, why are you confident in our ability to predict it?
Years of science education and seeing unfathomably complex systems modeled in high detail. DNA replication, transcription, and translation is extremely complex, but we figured it out.

Ultimately it goes back to those two premises I stated. They are extremely well supported by the evidence, and they have the unanimous (>97%) support of the world's scientists, and I think it's more likely that the world's scientists are right about this than that they are all collaborating in a worldwide conspiracy.

There's also the fact that the people who reject climate change tend to also be the people who reject evolution (using similar mental gymnastics to what you're doing), and happen to belong to the party of oil and coal. And we've been through this exact ordeal in the past regarding CFC's and lead additives in gasoline: people who have something to gain out of the status quo trying to muddy the waters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am a pretty big environmentalist.
Being an environmentalist and a libertarian is like being a pedophile and a babysitter.

The environment is the #1 reason I'm such a statist.
Last edited by Lune; 07-26-2016 at 04:19 PM..
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.