![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
I guess it's up to staff what solution they pursue, but the way I see it we have the following options: 1) Leave things as they are 2) Overhaul magician research right now to match those docs (laughably unrealistic imo) 3) Fill in the blanks in existing mage research with "unclassic" recipes but ones that make sense given the patterns << my proposal 4) Put spells back on vendors | |||
|
Last edited by Dolalin; 11-07-2019 at 05:09 PM..
|
|
|||
|
|