Kyle Rittenhouse = Based God

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by BlackBellamy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because eugenics is empirically correct. Even though natural mutations will always occur you can definitely improve the gene pool by culling the defective.

Eugenics is NOT empirically correct, because it is still JUST THEORY. It isn't even science because you couldn't even get viable results to study with TODAY from the studies done in the 1900's due to age, let alone the lack of any control study, or ability to maintain control of the study itself. Eugenics is not based on science. They (every scientist involved) learned it's based on a fallible opinion of what is good. And that's why eugenics never worked.

The only thing it gave us were words like: imbicile, retard, moron etc (true story they used these words to classify different levels of intellect and eugenics in the 1900s gave them the definitions we use today) (iirc this is like, Darwins brother even that did that or some shit I cant remember exactly).

So next time someone tells you retard is not a good word to say, tell them "did you know that it only exists to classify someone in a eugenics study and was never used by medical science?" and it literally means the exact same thing as imbicile, and moron. Just to name a couple.

Another thing to consider is, if we're putting bullets in the heads of people with downsydrom black bellamy, then there is no reason to maintain people who have such disruptive personalities in society either, so that means we should throw you in with the eugenics eradication too.

Stronger genetics in eugenics is a matter of a fallible opinion, and nature does it better! It's what we were designed to do, adapt to nature!