|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How do you feel about Enchanter's power level? Multiple choice allowed. | |||
| Non-classically overpowered and needs nerf |
   
|
66 | 33.33% |
| Non-classically overpowered and does not need nerf |
  
|
19 | 9.60% |
| Classically overpowered and needs nerf (Bard, Nec, etc examples) |
  
|
23 | 11.62% |
| Classically overpowered and does not need nerf |
  
|
88 | 44.44% |
| Trivializes content and needs nerf |
  
|
42 | 21.21% |
| Trivializes content and does not need nerf |
  
|
16 | 8.08% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
03-19-2021, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
There is no way OP can prove charm effectiveness from Classic era as opposed to now
For one, enchanters back in the classic era stacked INT. Not Charisma. Back then everyone assumed CHA was a useless stat. The meta was INT mana, mana, mana (always need more mana) "Everyone knows" this By that fact alone it's virtually impossible to prove his claims As someone else mentioned in this thread, the tactic is a never ending whine assault until the GMs don't want to listen to him anymore and give in Maybe if he called the spell racist he's have some success | ||
|
|
|||
|
|
Threaded Mode