Quote:
Originally Posted by G13
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Says fraudster digging into old news groups from 20+ years ago and claiming it's "evidence"
Keebs where are you Keebs?
|
Hi, Kerbs here. You might better know me as Azxten.
Setting the bar as thousands of lines of parses is unreasonable. The current implementation of channeling, charm, etc wasn’t implemented under such a high level of scrutiny.
If you want enchanter implementation to meet such scrutiny the only logical course of action would be to remove the class until the data could be found. Well done on getting enchanter deleted. I suppose it would be a largely classic implementation as no one played one before POP. Imperfect implementation is better than nothing. And imperfect changes that move p1999 closer to classic are better than non at all.