|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How do you feel about Enchanter's power level? Multiple choice allowed. | |||
| Non-classically overpowered and needs nerf |
   
|
66 | 33.33% |
| Non-classically overpowered and does not need nerf |
  
|
19 | 9.60% |
| Classically overpowered and needs nerf (Bard, Nec, etc examples) |
  
|
23 | 11.62% |
| Classically overpowered and does not need nerf |
  
|
88 | 44.44% |
| Trivializes content and needs nerf |
  
|
42 | 21.21% |
| Trivializes content and does not need nerf |
  
|
16 | 8.08% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
03-24-2021, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
I agree, but dont think there would be any reason for eqmac devs to touch charm logic in the few years it was in true development.
In any case, his parses from Al'Kabor match pretty high charm rates - but not really much data in terms of mob diversity. who knows what p99 has done to the eqemu charm logic. I do know it's different than eqemu because apparently on p99 cha effects charm duration - which isn't a true mechanic (it should only affect initial cast.) Can't find the evidence Torven has from eqmac. who knows if that makes charm shorter/longer on p99 though. I think the only true changes you'll see get implemented that effect charm duration on p99 are evidence of higher MR on certain mobs but that's hard to come by.
__________________
Surron / Geom
| ||
|
|
|||
|
|
Threaded Mode