Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've provided plenty of doubt. I'll include it again:
The video posted by OP includes some formulae that have no basis in known reality. Please prove the formulas are applicable to the case against Stunningly.
Hint: Just because you believe you can measure the ping of two different racers using FPS from a third racer doesn't make it true.
The video posted by OP includes a third party website that tests human reaction time to unrelated cues. Please prove the testing on this site is applicable to Stunningly's non-visual cues.
Hint: Just because you believe someone cannot have quick reaction time doesn't make it true.
To summarize, Riot wants Stunningly to be guilty of cheating, and they've provided fabricated evidence that frame him of guilt because it supports their belief that he's guilty.
The only reason I can think of that a person would accept such low standards of guilt is if they were involved with the production of the "evidence" which means your opinion is moot. You're biased because you want your story to be true, and here you are lashing out because someone smarter than you is here to tell you that it's not good enough.
That or there must be something in the Kool-Aid.
|
You come across as the kind of individual that thinks defending themselves in court is a good idea. Wish you the best man. Enjoy your autistic pixels.